comp.lang.fortran
- Re: Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Re: Compiling SPECFUN and similar libraries
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Re: Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Re: Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Re: Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Re: Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Re: Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Strange behavior using a module which uses another module
- Re: Compiling SPECFUN and similar libraries
- Re: Compiling SPECFUN and similar libraries
- Re: Compiling SPECFUN and similar libraries
- Re: Issue from IVF 9.0 to IVF 10.1
- Compiling SPECFUN and similar libraries
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- Re: Issue from IVF 9.0 to IVF 10.1
- Re: new Sun Studio Express release
- Re: new Sun Studio Express release
- Re: Issue from IVF 9.0 to IVF 10.1
- Re: OT -- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: new Sun Studio Express release
- Re: OT -- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Issue from IVF 9.0 to IVF 10.1
- Re: removing leading white space?
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- new Sun Studio Express release
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Issue from IVF 9.0 to IVF 10.1
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- Re: Issue from IVF 9.0 to IVF 10.1
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- Re: Preprocessing fortran
- Issue from IVF 9.0 to IVF 10.1
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- Re: ELEMENTAL functions and performance
- Re: OT -- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: trying to get back to fortran
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: trying to get back to fortran
- From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: trying to get back to fortran (was: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit)
- From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Vectorized real symmetric dense matrix diagonalization subroutine
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Software Package Free! ... about our Free Software
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: removing leading white space?
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: removing leading white space?
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Performance for standard operations in many subroutine calls
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Trust an Aussie to cut through the bullshit
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: solving for m
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Re: Integers and standard
- Vectorized real symmetric dense matrix diagonalization subroutine
- Integers and standard
- Re: Performance for standard operations in many subroutine calls
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: FFTW library
- Re: FFTW library
- Re: FFTW library
- Re: Performance for standard operations in many subroutine calls
- Re: solving for m
- Re: removing leading white space?
- Re: removing leading white space?
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- removing leading white space?
- Re: Preprocessing fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Preprocessing fortran
- Re: Performance for standard operations in many subroutine calls
- Preprocessing fortran
- Performance for standard operations in many subroutine calls
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- Re: solving for m
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Re: solving for m
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- solving for m
- Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Rifle & Ammunition Retail Store - Sportsman, Wildlife and Outdoor Supply
- From: rogerkolsson@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- FFTW library
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: whole number constants
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- Re: Type extension and renamed parent type
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Converting fixed form (F77) into free form (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Type extension and renamed parent type
- adidas adicolor shoes PayPal
- Re: writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- u just click,u see male&f-male health fitnessguide tips
- Re: F2003 and F2008 in windows' system are only dreams, far from us!
- Re: F2003 and F2008 in windows' system are only dreams, far from us!
- www.jumpmanlocker.com.cn good news prda adidas shoes dior fendi dsquand bureey polic sunglasses
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: Allocatable scalar components not allowed in derived types... why?
- Re: Allocatable scalar components not allowed in derived types... why?
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: Allocatable scalar components not allowed in derived types... why?
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: Allocatable scalar components not allowed in derived types... why?
- Re: Allocatable scalar components not allowed in derived types... why?
- Re: Segmentation Fault in calling FFTW
- Allocatable scalar components not allowed in derived types... why?
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: writing "big" binary files issue...
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: whole number constants
- Now registers the member to bestow 100 integrals! PayPal
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: Converting fixed form (F77) into free form (F90)
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- www.nikeadishoes.com
- Read a header and then a binary file?
- RE: Read a header and then a binary file?
- Re: Converting fixed form (F77) into free form (F90)
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: calling C from fortran
- Re: Segmentation Fault in calling FFTW
- Converting fixed form (F77) into free form (F90)
- Re: whole number constants
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- RE: Read a header and then a binary file?
- calling C from fortran
- Segmentation Fault in calling FFTW
- Re: CRAY
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: system
- Re: F2003 and F2008 in windows' system are only dreams, far from us!
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: NetCDF, Fortran, and Cygwin
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: FFTW libraries
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: whole number constants
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: whole number constants
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: whole number constants
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: [C/Fortran] writing "big" binary files issue...
- Re: CRAY
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: ifort, gfortran and %val
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: F2003 and F2008 in windows' system are only dreams, far from us!
- F2003 and F2008 in windows' system are only dreams, far from us!
- Re: NetCDF, Fortran, and Cygwin
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: NetCDF, Fortran, and Cygwin
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: NetCDF, Fortran, and Cygwin
- Re: FFTW libraries
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: CRAY
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: internal file and namelist
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- NetCDF, Fortran, and Cygwin
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: whole number constants
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: internal file and namelist
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: internal file and namelist
- Re: whole number constants
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- internal file and namelist
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- Re: whole number constants
- whole number constants
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- cheap air jordan 22 PayPal
- Re: FFTW libraries
- Re: Read the fortran unformatted binary data.
- Re: Mixed-language I/O jumble
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Read the fortran unformatted binary data.
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Anyone know about this error?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Anyone know about this error?
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Anyone know about this error?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Multi-Dimensional Arrays. Is it possible more than seven dimensions?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- cheap DG belt PayPal gift discount
- Re: Bill Gates writes a Fortran compiler
- We have many new activities on the website. PayPal
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: FFTW libraries
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: Read the fortran unformatted binary data.
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: Question about READ statement
- my friend good quality, low price, best Service,
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: FFTW libraries
- Re: Calling gfortran from gcc, passing a string
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Calling gfortran from gcc, passing a string
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Bill Gates writes a Fortran compiler
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Calling gfortran from gcc, passing a string
- Re: Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: FFTW libraries
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Anyone know about this error?
- Re: Bill Gates writes a Fortran compiler
- Re: Seg Fault and PRINT
- Re: Anyone know about this error?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: CRAY
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Read the fortran unformatted binary data.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: need help to solve 2D poisson equation using Fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Can't seem to extract data from this ASCII file
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Calling gfortran from gcc, passing a string
- Re: Mixed-language I/O jumble
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: how comes data become a charactor...?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Question about READ statement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Multi-Dimensional Arrays. Is it possible more than seven dimensions?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: ifort, gfortran and %val
- Re: ifort, gfortran and %val
- Re: Help Requested Applying Minimum Surveying Routine to Program
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: ifort, gfortran and %val
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: how to use Release compiler for Fortran90
- Re: how to use Release compiler for Fortran90
- how to use Release compiler for Fortran90
- Re: Calling gfortran from gcc, passing a string
- We have many new activities on the website. PayPal
- Re: FFTW libraries
- Re: PROBLEM WITH ALLOCATABLE ARRAYS
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Question about READ statement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: What to do with all those % symbols?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- FFTW libraries
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: What to do with all those % symbols?
- Re: PROBLEM WITH ALLOCATABLE ARRAYS
- Calling gfortran from gcc, passing a string
- Re: What to do with all those % symbols?
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: PROBLEM WITH ALLOCATABLE ARRAYS
- Re: What to do with all those % symbols?
- Re: PROBLEM WITH ALLOCATABLE ARRAYS
- Re: PROBLEM WITH ALLOCATABLE ARRAYS
- Re: What to do with all those % symbols?
- Re: What to do with all those % symbols?
- What to do with all those % symbols?
- Re: ifort, gfortran and %val
- wholesale ARMANI shoes
- wholesale ARMANI
- Re: PROBLEM WITH ALLOCATABLE ARRAYS
- Bill Gates writes a Fortran compiler
- Re: ifort, gfortran and %val
- Re: PROBLEM WITH ALLOCATABLE ARRAYS
- Re: Unknown construction
- ifort, gfortran and %val
- Re: Seg Fault and PRINT
- Re: Mixed-language I/O jumble
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: system
- Re: Seg Fault and PRINT
- Re: Anyone know about this error?
- Anyone know about this error?
- Re: rationale for multiple codimensions
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: rationale for multiple codimensions
- Re: j3 mailing list
- rationale for multiple codimensions
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Unknown construction
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Seg Fault and PRINT
- Re: Seg Fault and PRINT
- Re: Seg Fault and PRINT
- Seg Fault and PRINT
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: j3 mailing list
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: system
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: system
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Help Requested Applying Minimum Surveying Routine to Program
- Re: Help Requested Applying Minimum Surveying Routine to Program
- Help Requested Applying Minimum Surveying Routine to Program
- Re: j3 mailing list
- Re: difference between mod and modulo
- j3 mailing list
- Re: difference between mod and modulo
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: difference between mod and modulo
- Re: difference between mod and modulo
- Re: difference between mod and modulo
- air force 2 shoes whole sale website www.shoeshive.net
- difference between mod and modulo
- Re: Multi-Dimensional Arrays. Is it possible more than seven dimensions?
- Re: system
- Re: Multi-Dimensional Arrays. Is it possible more than seven dimensions?
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- CAR CHEAP INSURANCE
- Re: system
- Re: system
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: system
- paypal wholesale Crown Holder jeans (paypal accept)(www good-saler cn )
- paypal wholesale Armani hoody (paypal accept)(www good-saler cn )
- paypal wholesale Armani jeans (paypal accept)(www good-saler cn )
- Re: system
- Re: Unknown construction
- system
- Re: Multi-Dimensional Arrays. Is it possible more than seven dimensions?
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Multi-Dimensional Arrays. Is it possible more than seven dimensions?
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: Unknown construction
- Re: Unknown construction
- Unknown construction
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: Derived Types, Allocatable Elements and Vectorization
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: Derived Types, Allocatable Elements and Vectorization
- Re: Derived Types, Allocatable Elements and Vectorization
- Re: Derived Types, Allocatable Elements and Vectorization
- Derived Types, Allocatable Elements and Vectorization
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: compatibility g77/gfortran ?
- defined operator & assignment speed & memory usage problem
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: error while writing the data
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: error while writing the data
- error while writing the data
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- Re: how comes data become a charactor...?
- rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 3
- how comes data become a charactor...?
- Re: Mixed-language I/O jumble
- Re: Mixed-language I/O jumble
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: how to convert variable name to a string?
- how to convert variable name to a string?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: compatibility g77/gfortran ?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Question about READ statement
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- compatibility g77/gfortran ?
- Question about READ statement
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: Mixed-language I/O jumble
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- RE: Question about READ statement
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Bug in IBM Fortran compiler?
- Re: Bug in IBM Fortran compiler?
- Re: Mixed-language I/O jumble
- Mixed-language I/O jumble
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 1
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 2
- rpc's comments on Fortran 2008, part 1
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: Bug in IBM Fortran compiler?
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Bug in IBM Fortran compiler?
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: another way to shoot yourself in the foot?
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: derived data and pointer
- Re: derived data and pointer
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: derived data and pointer
- derived data and pointer
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Trying to use a logical as an array index
- Re: gfortran netCDF problem
- gfortran netCDF problem
- Re: Can't seem to extract data from this ASCII file
- Can't seem to extract data from this ASCII file
- Re: Overflow errror--what could cause this?
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: question about assigning values to a matrix
- Re: question about assigning values to a matrix
- Re: Overflow errror--what could cause this?
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: HPF for message passing interface (MPI) Question
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: need help to solve 2D poisson equation using Fortran
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- HPF for message passing interface (MPI) Question
- Compaq Visual Fortran and HDF
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Overflow errror--what could cause this?
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- RE: Compaq Visual Fortran and HDF
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- need help to solve 2D poisson equation using Fortran
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: question about assigning values to a matrix
- Re: Could anybody give an instruction to solve poisson equation?
- Could anybody give an instruction to solve poisson equation?
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: question about assigning values to a matrix
- question about assigning values to a matrix
- Re: include .inc file
- include .inc file
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- gdb, gfortran and an elementary program
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: newbie: problem with TRANSPOSE
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: save statement in a module
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Best way to allocate array within subroutine
- Two band matrixes product? Blas?
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: faster version of anint()
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: faster version of anint()
- faster version of anint()
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- brothers and sisters must register and send this article to users
- Re: Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Read the fortran unformatted binary data.
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: Read the fortran unformatted binary data.
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Read the fortran unformatted binary data.
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: CRAY
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: Public review - Submodules
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- rlft3.f (3D Fast Fourier transform subroutine)???
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Public review - the g0 edit descriptor
- Public review - Submodules
- Public review - Impure elementals
- Public review - CRITICAL and BLOCK
- Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
- Public review - new intrinsic procdures
- Public review
- Re: Block data in library
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: Doubt about formula transcription
- Re: Any fortran 90 to C converter available?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: a compile problem about loop func
- bug with ifort + openmp : allocatable array not allocated after allocation
- Re: write matrix
- Re: the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: write matrix
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: write matrix
- write matrix
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: newbie: problem with TRANSPOSE
- Re: the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- the g0 edit descriptor
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Calling user-specified functions
- Re: Foray Build Tool Project Started
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Fortran 90 and GUIs
- Re: Get system time
- Re: Get system time
- Re: ftcl
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Get system time
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: ftcl
- Re: ftcl
- Re: ftcl
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: ftcl
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- Re: ftcl
- Re: "system" extension on Windows
- ftcl
- "system" extension on Windows
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: FYI/OT: [Fwd: ANN: Units of measurement for Ada v2.7]
- Re: FYI/OT: [Fwd: ANN: Units of measurement for Ada v2.7]
- Re: FYI/OT: [Fwd: ANN: Units of measurement for Ada v2.7]
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: FYI/OT: [Fwd: ANN: Units of measurement for Ada v2.7]
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- FYI/OT: [Fwd: ANN: Units of measurement for Ada v2.7]
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Re: public comment on fortran 2008
- Fortran numerical server using Com server wizard.
- Re: IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Block data in library
- Native Fortran 77 - CGI interface howto
- Re: How to read a csv file when the date comes with /?
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: error during write
- newbie: problem with TRANSPOSE
- Re: error during write
- Re: newbie: array input
- Re: error during write
- Re: error during write
- Re: error during write
- Re: error during write
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Block data in library
- error during write
- error during write
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- Re: IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- Re: Block data in library
- Re: IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- IMPURE ELEMENTALs
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Block data in library
- Re: Calling user-specified functions
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Calling user-specified functions
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Calling user-specified functions
- Re: Calling user-specified functions
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Calling user-specified functions
- Re: Block data in library
- Re: Block data in library
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Block data in library
- Block data in library
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Doubt about formula transcription
- Re: bug in g95 with character arrays?
- Re: bug in g95 with character arrays?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: Fortran bashing in the MATLAB newsgroup
- Re: a compile problem about loop func
- Re: Instralling g95 for Red Hat Linux
- Re: a compile problem about loop func
- Re: a compile problem about loop func
- Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Re: a compile problem about loop func
- a compile problem about loop func
