Re: whole number constants
- From: "robin" <robin_v@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:14:05 GMT
"Paul van Delst" <Paul.vanDelst@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:g64n29$839$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Richard Maine wrote:
There is no such thing as a "true constant."
Completely off topic, but never a truer word has been spoken.
According to Murphy's Law, constants aren't.
And this especially applies to Fortran.
Even fundamental constants
(Planck, Boltzmann, fine-structure etc) are updated every four years or so as measurements
of things like the molar gas constant, avagodro's#, electron charge, etc improve. Or you
use even more digits for pi (if you're using the magnetic permeability).
Anyway....
cheers,
paulv
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: whole number constants
- From: J. F. Cornwall
- Re: whole number constants
- References:
- whole number constants
- From: dancerchris
- Re: whole number constants
- From: *** Hendrickson
- Re: whole number constants
- From: dancerchris
- Re: whole number constants
- From: dancerchris
- Re: whole number constants
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: whole number constants
- From: dancerchris
- Re: whole number constants
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: whole number constants
- From: Paul van Delst
- whole number constants
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
- Next by Date: Re: Unknown construction
- Previous by thread: Re: whole number constants
- Next by thread: Re: whole number constants
- Index(es):