Re: Integers and standard
- From: kargl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Steven G. Kargl)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
In article <02tjk.138695$102.39915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"James Giles" <jamesgiles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I certainly think that if the compiler doesn't detect integer
overflow at run-time, there should at least be an option to
ignore the problem at compile-time as well.
-fno-range-check has been availabe for more than 2 years. RTFM.
--
Steve
http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: James Giles
- Re: Integers and standard
- References:
- Integers and standard
- From: Alfredo Buttari
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: James Giles
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: James Giles
- Integers and standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Integers and standard
- Next by Date: Re: Integers and standard
- Previous by thread: Re: Integers and standard
- Next by thread: Re: Integers and standard
- Index(es):