Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***
- From: Dan Nagle <dannagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:54:07 GMT
Hello,
On 2008-07-29 01:29:27 -0400, Gib Bogle <g.bogle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Gib Bogle wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/28/rice-adviser-iraq-invasio_n_115398.html
My
apologies - this was meant for another newsgroup.
Don't apologize, I got a kick out of it.
Last night, I finished Richard Clarke's book.
He explains the invasion as the result of an idee fixe,
and, rather politely, explains why it was counter-productive.
Clarke got into cyber security before leaving government
(on the grounds that he was demoted after being ignored
as a counter-terrorism advisor).
(Trying desperately to get this back to Fortran ...)
I hope Fortran will be one of the languages to have
a language-specific Annex in the initial release
of the OWG-V TR on reducing programming vulnerabilities.
(That's bureaucratic-speak for bugs.) Many programmers
will be held to OWG-V standards.
I suppose we'll never eliminate fat-finger mistakes. :-(
(That's Malaligned Digital-Keyboard Impact Sequence
for you guvmint types. :-)
--
Cheers!
Dan Nagle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: trying to get back to fortran (was: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***)
- From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- Re: trying to get back to fortran (was: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***)
- References:
- Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***
- From: Gib Bogle
- Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***
- Prev by Date: Re: Integers and standard
- Next by Date: Re: trying to get back to fortran (was: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT -- Re: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***
- Next by thread: Re: trying to get back to fortran (was: Trust an Aussie to cut through the bull***)
- Index(es):