Re: Integers and standard
- From: Steve Lionel <Steve.Lionel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:07:29 -0400
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:28:54 -0800, glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Steve Lionel wrote:
(snip)
VAX FORTRAN support for these types was there as soon as the types
existed. You had to choose between D and G formats for your double
precision type. REAL*16 was always H.
Also, I didn't see anything about library support for D vs. G.
Did the compiler automatically call the right library routine
for the appropriate type?
You mean such as math routines? Yes, of course. You had to use a
compile-time switch (or a directive in the source) to select between D and G.
The difference was largely transparent to the user, except when you made the
mistake of passing a single to a routine that accepted a double (as noted in
this thread.)
--
Steve Lionel
Developer Products Division
Intel Corporation
Nashua, NH
For email address, replace "invalid" with "com"
User communities for Intel Software Development Products
http://softwareforums.intel.com/
Intel Fortran Support
http://support.intel.com/support/performancetools/fortran
My Fortran blog
http://www.intel.com/software/drfortran
.
- References:
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Klaus Wacker
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Ken . Fairfield
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Integers and standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Integers and standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple Program, Lots of Issues (F90)
- Next by Date: Re: Writing $00-$FF via Fortran
- Previous by thread: Re: Integers and standard
- Next by thread: Re: Integers and standard
- Index(es):