Re: Most efficient way to write a large matrix to disk
- From: "Lorents" <fdsa@xxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:23:31 +0100
Arjan wrote:
Hi!
Without any intent of being rude (this is a serious consideration):
when you're handling such large matrices,
isn't it time to ask yourself the question: "Are all the data that I
want to store still meaningful?"
Hi,
unfortunately the answer is "yes" as these data
are intermediate for computing other quantities.
In my particular case, they are the nuclear-motion
wave functions for a triatomic molecule.
What is stored are the values of
each wave function on a 3D grid.
A typical grid is about 100x100x50 (in some coordinate
system) while the number of wave functions (states)
is of the order of 500-1000, so it's not too difficult
to get a huge number of values.
The wave functions are needed later
to calculate transition intensities and other quantities.
Lorenzo
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Most efficient way to write a large matrix to disk
- Next by Date: Re: busting sp datatypes
- Previous by thread: Re: Most efficient way to write a large matrix to disk
- Next by thread: Re: Most efficient way to write a large matrix to disk
- Index(es):