Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: "Dr Ivan D. Reid" <Ivan.Reid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:30:09 -0700, Richard Maine <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <1ime08w.1tfbaw61g0gtd4N%nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Dr Ivan D. Reid <Ivan.Reid@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:24:38 -0400, LR <lruss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <48b6ed30$0$31956$cc2e38e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
IIRC equivalence is being depreciated
"deprecated", please. It's not going down in value.
Hmm. Well I suppose one might argue for either point. :-)
...and so a meme was planted.
--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
.
- References:
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: wim
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: LR
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- Prev by Date: Re: Project dependency of CVF 6.6c
- Next by Date: Re: Most efficient way to write a large matrix to disk
- Previous by thread: Re: busting sp datatypes
- Next by thread: novice needs help
- Index(es):