comp.lang.fortran
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: Sebastian Gallinat
- list of currently ALLOCATED variables
- From: davidgkinniburgh
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: dpb
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: dpb
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: David Simpson
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- How to compile Mopac 7.1 using g77 or gfortran
- From: Jinsong.Zhao@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: Damian
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: loss of precision
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: Damian
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: David Simpson
- Fortran Courses in Shrivenham, Swindon UK
- From: Shaun
- Re: MPI beginner
- From: Arjen Markus
- MPI beginner
- From: Rick
- Re: loss of precision
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: OT: Help - Fortranlib.com
- From: JB
- Re: loss of precision
- From: dpb
- Re: loss of precision
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: loss of precision
- From: rudra
- Re: loss of precision
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: OT: Help - Fortranlib.com
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: loss of precision
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: loss of precision
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: loss of precision
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: loss of precision
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: OT: Help - Fortranlib.com
- From: JB
- Re: loss of precision
- From: dominiq
- Re: loss of precision
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- loss of precision
- From: rudra
- OT: Help - Fortranlib.com
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- From: Damian
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: e p chandler
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: e p chandler
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: e p chandler
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: dpb
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Damian
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: dpb
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: dpb
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: dpb
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: dpb
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: randomaccessiterator
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: JB
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: dpb
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: randomaccessiterator
- allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: randomaccessiterator
- Re: Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- From: Carlie J. Coats
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Daniel Kraft
- Re: det yesnack
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: JB
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: A specification expression error!?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Richard Maine
- A specification expression error!?
- From: deadpickle
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: warnings for lapack routines
- From: user1
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Damian
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Daniel Kraft
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Damian
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Damian
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: unprotected_pointer => protected_pointer
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Damian
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: Michael Prager
- Re: warnings for lapack routines
- From: dpb
- Re: warnings for lapack routines
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: warnings for lapack routines
- From: user1
- Re: Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: warnings for lapack routines
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Arjen Markus
- warnings for lapack routines
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: David Duffy
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- From: Makis
- Re: Segmentation Fault using cron
- From: Craig Powers
- Segmentation Fault using cron
- From: Marcelo Almeida de Amorim
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: michels
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- From: Richard Maine
- Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- From: brady . m . adams
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: Michael Prager
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: Michael Prager
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: e p chandler
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: Michael Prager
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: peter . king
- Re: simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- simple graphics for fortran on windows
- From: peter . king
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: s_siouris
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: det yesnack
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Avoiding nested IF conditionals,and STOP statement
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Antoon
- det yesnack
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: [lenny] splashy et lilo.conf...
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: random ints on a large symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Error Condition Testing
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Error Condition Testing
- From: Dan Nagle
- Error Condition Testing
- From: Dan
- Re: rounding mode
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Avoiding nested IF conditionals,and STOP statement
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Avoiding nested IF conditionals,and STOP statement
- From: e p chandler
- IEEE 754r published (Was: Re: rounding mode)
- From: JB
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Avoiding nested IF conditionals,and STOP statement
- From: dpb
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Avoiding nested IF conditionals,and STOP statement
- From: s_siouris
- Alternative to the STOP statement?
- From: s_siouris
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: dpb
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: GaryScott
- Friendfeed room "fortran coding"
- From: mcastel
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: dpb
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Write statement in subroutine affecting output of return values
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: dimensions and segmentation fault problem
- From: mcastel
- Re: rounding mode
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: dimensions and segmentation fault problem
- From: rudra
- Re: Write statement in subroutine affecting output of return values
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: dimensions and segmentation fault problem
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: dimensions and segmentation fault problem
- From: Arjen Markus
- dimensions and segmentation fault problem
- From: mcastel
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Catherine Rees Lay
- Re: Write statement in subroutine affecting output of return values
- From: Catherine Rees Lay
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: rounding mode
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: rounding mode
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: rudra
- rounding mode
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: David Duffy
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: rudra
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: rudra
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: rudra
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: rudra
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: rudra
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: dpb
- Re: Efficient way of finding most-significant non-zero bit of integer
- From: Terence
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Arjan
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Steven Correll
- Re: Efficient way of finding most-significant non-zero bit of integer
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Write statement in subroutine affecting output of return values
- From: charlie818
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Efficient way of finding most-significant non-zero bit of integer
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: segmentation fault
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Efficient way of finding most-significant non-zero bit of integer
- From: ttw6687
- Re: Efficient way of finding most-significant non-zero bit of integer
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: Efficient way of finding most-significant non-zero bit of integer
- From: James Van Buskirk
- segmentation fault
- From: rudra
- Re: Write statement in subroutine affecting output of return values
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Write statement in subroutine affecting output of return values
- From: charlie818
- Efficient way of finding most-significant non-zero bit of integer
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Antoon
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: JayBee
- Compilation order (USE assocs)
- From: Antoon
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Cirilo S. Bresolin
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: random ints on a large symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: PASSING ARRAY FORTRAN DLL TO/FROM VBA EXCEL
- From: kis
- Re: Surprise
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: PASSING ARRAY FORTRAN DLL TO/FROM VBA EXCEL
- From: dpb
- Re: PASSING ARRAY FORTRAN DLL TO/FROM VBA EXCEL
- From: kis
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Reinhold Bader
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Scope of implicit none
- From: Richard Maine
- Scope of implicit none
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Surprise
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: BLOCK WAS VECTORIZED.
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: stevenb . gcc
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: steven . bosscher
- Re: .NOT. (Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran) :o)
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: "Final" Procedures
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: random ints on a large symmetric interval
- From: e p chandler
- Re: random ints on a large symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: "Final" Procedures
- From: Terence
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: BLOCK WAS VECTORIZED.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: BLOCK WAS VECTORIZED.
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- BLOCK WAS VECTORIZED.
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: robert . corbett
- Passing module procedures to external procedures -- type issues
- From: Rich Townsend
- Re: "Final" Procedures
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: steven . bosscher
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: steven . bosscher
- Re: "Final" Procedures
- From: Terence
- Re: .NOT. (Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran) :o)
- From: Terence
- Re: .NOT. (Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran) :o)
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: user1
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: fj
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: dpb
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: "Final" Procedures
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Carlie J. Coats
- Re: "Final" Procedures
- From: e p chandler
- Re: "Final" Procedures
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: PASSING ARRAY FORTRAN DLL TO/FROM VBA EXCEL
- From: e p chandler
- "Final" Procedures
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: bru
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: bru
- PASSING ARRAY FORTRAN DLL TO/FROM VBA EXCEL
- From: kis
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: teg
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: dpb
- Re: Combining Lua and Fortran
- From: nobat
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: JayBee
- .NOT. (Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran) :o)
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Carlie J. Coats
- DATA statement to initialise arrays
- From: bru
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Damian
- Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: e p chandler
- Not! Praise for Gfortran
- From: Carlie J. Coats
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: JayBee
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: michael . caracotsios
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: e p chandler
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: using a lapack routine
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: Ron Ford
- using a lapack routine
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Combining Lua and Fortran
- From: David Duffy
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: David Duffy
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Damian
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: steven . bosscher
- Re: Source code beautifier for f90 and f77
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: Source code beautifier for f90 and f77
- From: Lynn McGuire
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Combining Lua and Fortran
- From: nobat
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: GaryScott
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: Problem with array dereferencing during using gdb with gfortran code
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Problem with array dereferencing during using gdb with gfortran code
- From: steven . bosscher
- Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Damian
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: dpb
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: Robert Singer
- Praise for Gfortran (finally)
- From: Al Greynolds
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: Robert Singer
- Problem with array dereferencing during using gdb with gfortran code
- From: beppo_anmeldung
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: dpb
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: GaryScott
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: James Parsly
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: e p chandler
- Re: traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Damian
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Damian
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Raúl
- Re: traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: dpb
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: rusi_pathan
- Re: random ints on symmetric interval
- From: e p chandler
- Re: OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Richard Maine
- OT: Determining the size of plotting area
- From: Robert Singer
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- random ints on symmetric interval
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Nathan Seese
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: rusi_pathan
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Paul van Delst
- traverse linked list (Fortran 90)
- From: e p chandler
- Re: pointer components and memory leaks
- From: Richard Maine
- pointer components and memory leaks
- From: mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Arjen Markus
- Reading external variables from a library (BIND)
- From: Raúl
- Re: Possible ambiguity with continuation lines and comments
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Possible ambiguity with continuation lines and comments
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Possible ambiguity with continuation lines and comments
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: type-bound procedures and type extension
- From: Simulate
- Re: Passing an allocatable array to a subroutine
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Passing an allocatable array to a subroutine
- From: fj
- Passing an allocatable array to a subroutine
- From: deadpickle
- Re: type-bound procedures and type extension
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: type-bound procedures and type extension
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Date representation
- From: michels
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: David Thompson
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Harold Stevens
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: type-bound procedures and type extension
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: type-bound procedures and type extension
- From: Simulate
- Re: type-bound procedures and type extension
- From: Simulate
- cheap sale fendi and prada bags
- From: ff
- Re: gfortran compiler
- From: fj
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Ian
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Ian
- gfortran compiler
- From: daibid
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: user1
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: ralf.schaa
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: F
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: dpb
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- type-bound procedures and type extension
- From: Damian
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: none
- Re: Date representation
- From: Marin Brkic
- Re: Date representation
- From: Marin Brkic
- Re: Date representation
- From: Marin Brkic
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: calculation of bessel functions j_l(x)
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: calculation of bessel functions j_l(x)
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: calculation of bessel functions j_l(x)
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: calculation of bessel functions j_l(x)
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: calculation of bessel functions j_l(x)
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: calculation of bessel functions j_l(x)
- From: ralf.schaa
- calculation of bessel functions j_l(x)
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: michaelmetcalf
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Nathan Seese
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: Dan
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: LAPACK95
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: size of space to be allocated
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- LAPACK95
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: unprotected_pointer => protected_pointer
- From: Richard Maine
- EigenValues and EigenVectors with LAPACK
- From: michael . caracotsios
- Re: size of space to be allocated
- From: Steven Correll
- unprotected_pointer => protected_pointer
- From: Steven Correll
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: Yura
- Re: F
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: ralf.schaa
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: ralf.schaa
- Re: where and non-conformable arrays
- From: Arjen Markus
- where and non-conformable arrays
- From: ralf.schaa
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: F
- From: dpb
- Re: F
- From: Dan Nagle
- F
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Source code beautifier for f90 and f77
- From: Arjan
- Re: Source code beautifier for f90 and f77
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Source code beautifier for f90 and f77
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: Source code beautifier for f90 and f77
- From: Ragu
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Ragu
- Source code beautifier for f90 and f77
- From: Arjan
- Re: Date representation
- From: Arjan
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Ragu
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: James Parsly
- Re: Date representation
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Date representation
- From: feenberg
- Re: Date representation
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Date representation
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Date representation
- From: David Jones
- Re: Date representation
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Ian Bush
- Date representation
- From: Marin Brkic
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: George McBane
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: George McBane
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: George McBane
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Sjouke Burry
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Ragu
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Richard Maine
- Returning a dynamic character array based on input length
- From: Ragu
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Leclerc
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: dpb
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: dpb
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: paya
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: michaelmetcalf
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Robustness checkers for Fortran code.
- From: dpb
- Re: Robustness checkers for Fortran code.
- From: dpb
- Robustness checkers for Fortran code.
- From: Toon Moene
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Dave
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Jörgen Tegnér
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Richard Maine
- Fortran equivalent to Matlab's eig() function
- From: Dave
- Did NAG fortran complier support OPENMP?
- From: Simulate
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: [ANN] binary of gcc 4.3.2 for Windows is available for download
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: Jan Vorbrüggen
- some flags for optimization?? ( run with higher speed)??
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: [ANN] binary of gcc 4.3.2 for Windows is available for download
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: [ANN] binary of gcc 4.3.2 for Windows is available for download
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Implementing JAVA interfaces in FORTRAN 20xx
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Implementing JAVA interfaces in FORTRAN 20xx
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Implementing JAVA interfaces in FORTRAN 20xx
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: adapting a quicksort
- From: ttw6687
- Re: Surprise
- From: Terence
- Re: Surprise
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Implementing JAVA interfaces in FORTRAN 20xx
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Surprise
- From: David Thompson
- Re: adapting a quicksort
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: read binary file written in fortran from another language
- From: AnotherSquid
- Re: Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: JayBee
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: size of space to be allocated
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: George Trojan
- Re: Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: rusi_pathan
- Re: Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: rusi_pathan
- Re: size of space to be allocated
- From: Steven Correll
- Auto-testing for memory leaks.
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Colin Paul Gloster
- Re: How to create a new folder in FORTRAN 77?
- From: Catherine Rees Lay
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Fortran vs. Matlab on linear algebra
- From: tyler . thessin
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Leslie Ballentine
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Will W.
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Will W.
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Will W.
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: deltaquattro
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: Paul van Delst
- How to make a function work with different type and kind type argument
- From: deltaquattro
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Michel Olagnon
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Herman D . Knoble
- Re: Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Damian
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Kurt Kallblad
- Re: internal write rounds wrong
- From: Tim Prince
- internal write rounds wrong
- From: phantasmus
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: doxygen (Just a workaround, because the software is not meaned to run for fortran).
- From: rudra
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: LR
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: LR
- Re: read binary file written in fortran from another language
- From: e p chandler
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: read binary file written in fortran from another language
- From: dpb
- read binary file written in fortran from another language
- From: utab
- Re: doxygen (Just a workaround, because the software is not meaned to run for fortran).
- From: Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- Re: C++ wrapper for fortran functions
- From: JayBee
- doxygen
- From: rudra
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: C++ wrapper for fortran functions
- From: utab
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: C++ wrapper for fortran functions
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Arjen Markus
- Parallel in Fortran90
- From: Fatemeh
- Re: C++ wrapper for fortran functions
- From: utab
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: C++ wrapper for fortran functions
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Conversion from int to char
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: C++ wrapper for fortran functions
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: C++ wrapper for fortran functions
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: adapting a quicksort
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Will W.
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Will W.
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: odd compiler complaints with large numbers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Conversion from int to char
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: array constructor syntax
- From: Cornelis
- Any suggested workarounds for writing wrappers for functions that are to be passed as arguments?
- From: Will W.
- Re: Conversion from int to char
- From: fm2766
- Re: array constructor syntax
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: array constructor syntax
- From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: array constructor syntax
- From: rusi_pathan
- array constructor syntax
- From: Cornelis
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: dpb
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: odd compiler complaints with large numbers
- From: e p chandler
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: ianbush . throwaway . account
- Re: Project dependency of CVF 6.6c
- From: ianbush . throwaway . account
- Re: novice needs help
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: size of space to be allocated
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Fortran Forum Recommendation
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Project dependency of CVF 6.6c
- From: Mike
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: C Interoperability - Strings
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: Conversion from int to char
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: busting sp datatypes
- From: Ron Ford
