Praise for Gfortran (finally)



Over the last few years I have developed a 30,000 line Fortran-95
engineering application using simultaneously several compilers (XLF,
LF95, G95, and IVF). During that time I toyed with Gfortran and put
up with the 2 steps forward, 1 step back of each binary build.
However, I'm now happy to report my "last" issue with it has been
resolved and more importantly performance is almost identical to XLF
and IVF in most cases. Congratulations to all involved with this
project!

Al Greynolds
www.ruda.com
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
    ... LF95, G95, and IVF). ... resolved and more importantly performance is almost identical to XLF ... I tried to reproduce the message "Warning: nonconforming tab ..." ... I am sure the Gfortran people ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Not! Praise for Gfortran
    ... LF95, G95, and IVF). ... resolved and more importantly performance is almost identical to XLF ... Claiming success when the actual result is failure is *CRAP*. ... In GCC (and therefore also in gfortran), ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Not! Praise for Gfortran
    ... Al Greynolds wrote: ... LF95, G95, and IVF). ... resolved and more importantly performance is almost identical to XLF ... Claiming success when the actual result is failure is *CRAP*. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
    ... LF95, G95, and IVF). ... During that time I toyed withGfortranand put ... resolved and more importantly performance is almost identical to XLF ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Praise for Gfortran (finally)
    ... LF95, G95, and IVF). ... During that time I toyed withGfortranand put ... I'm now happy to report my "last" issue with it has been ... resolved and more importantly performance is almost identical to XLF ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)