Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Gary Scott <garylscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:42:45 -0500
e p chandler wrote:
On Sep 27, 8:20 pm, nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine) wrote:
e p chandler <e...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do remember that Fortran Powerstation 4.0 did have a memory leak
problem, but I can not remember if that leak surviced process
termination. My somewhat fualty memory says that the leak persisted.
[snip]
That's much along the same vein as internal compiler errors as sometimes
discussed here. An internal compiler error *ALWAYS* counts as a compiler
bug. There might also be bugs in the code, but crashing because of code
bugs would be a compiler bug.
Likewise, memory leaks that persist past the end of an application
process would always be an OS bug. They might also reflect bugs in the
application, but the persistance would be an OS bug.
I think you misrecall. But if you do recall correctly, that would count
as an OS bug.
Yes I my memory was wrong.
As the leaking application ran on, committed memory increased as
displayed in the task manager. This, as I somehow forgot, is memory
associated with a process. When the process terminates, the memory use
does too.
I think it is possible to have an application terminate but the resources associated with the GUI (handles, widgets, windows) not be recovered. That may or may not technically be a "leak", but I'd call it a leak. There's a tool with CVF (SPY?) that lets you look at these GUI resources.
- e
- e
--
Gary Scott
mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net
Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html
If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done.
-- Henry Ford
.
- References:
- allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: randomaccessiterator
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: e p chandler
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: e p chandler
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- From: e p chandler
- allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- Prev by Date: Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- Next by Date: Re: Cost of Large Modules Compared to Many Small Modules
- Previous by thread: Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- Next by thread: Re: allocatable non-dummy local variables and pointers to them
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|