Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: Gary Scott <garylscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:31:01 -0500
George wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:19:31 -0500, Gary Scott wrote:Was referring to the out of order sorting of these threads in google groups.
Gary Scott wrote:
George wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:46:41 -0500, Gary Scott wrote:
Thomas Koenig wrote:
On 2008-10-31, Richard Maine <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It would be
really out of place to have everything else about I/O be optional, but
that one property not be; seems unlikely.
I can well imagine an embedded system which doesn't even have files.
I would imagine that C would be the usual language for these, but
in a non-hosted environment (which means that I/O doesn't have to
be available), but there's no reason that Fortran could not be used
instead.
Fortran was used in some embedded environments. It is still listed as a component of some embedded development environments but few of those are actively used or marketed (or updated).
But it takes more than a syntax and a bunch of chips to make an integrated
circuit. It takes less effort and money to do this using windows and C
than one might believe, with development environments like Win AVR.
those embedded-suitable fortran compilers had all the necessary extensions such that it wasn't any easier necessarily. More important is what the OS API is written in.
I was unaware that such tools existed for fortran. The advantage to WinAVR
is the price: free, and having a group of people out there that you can
talk to about it.
comp.arch.embedded has lively discussions of relevant issues. I'm wiring
the fans in my hallway so that a microchip could run them, which is to say,
I'm finishing the hallway so that wires can be fished through without
grief.
i've done a lot of pulling wires of all sorts through inner and outer walls (i hate outer walls, at least in some roof designs)
That's why they have hammer drills and I have hearing loss.
ooops, one of us has a time zone problem
It's seven bells on my machine, which agrees when I google for time.
Maybe you're getting nervous for your thesis defense and best distract
yourself. (I'm hyper-aware of time when I'm nervous about having to do
something.)
Might be a good night to go see "W."
--
Gary Scott
mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net
Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html
If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done.
-- Henry Ford
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: George
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: George
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- References:
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: George
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- From: George
- Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- Prev by Date: Re: Strange FORTRAN IV to F77 conversion occurrence
- Next by Date: Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- Previous by thread: Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- Next by thread: Re: [gfortran43] opening file twice...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|