comp.lang.fortran
- FORTRAN dynamic arrays used as parameters of functions called from C++,
Matthew Della
- Message not available
- about the order of program units,
hes selex
- Re: about the order of program units,
Arjen Markus
- Re: about the order of program units,
hes selex
- Re: about the order of program units, Arjen Markus
- Re: about the order of program units, hes selex
- Re: about the order of program units, Arjen Markus
- Re: about the order of program units, Steve Lionel
- Re: about the order of program units, hes selex
- Re: about the order of program units, hes selex
- Re: about the order of program units, Arjan
- Re: about the order of program units,
hes selex
- Re: about the order of program units, Richard Maine
- Re: about the order of program units,
Arjen Markus
- inputting the ephemerides,
George
- Re: inputting the ephemerides, jon
- Re: inputting the ephemerides,
Arjen Markus
- Re: inputting the ephemerides, Terence
- porting union, map to gfortran,
raju
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran,
dpb
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran,
dpb
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, none
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, dpb
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, ken . fairfield
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, dpb
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, Gary Scott
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran,
dpb
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, Arjen Markus
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran, Thomas Koenig
- Re: porting union, map to gfortran,
dpb
- how to link subroutines with main program?, soms . sharma
- sequence points and the execution model,
George
- Re: sequence points and the execution model,
Terence
- Re: sequence points and the execution model, glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: sequence points and the execution model, George
- Re: sequence points and the execution model,
Craig Powers
- Re: sequence points and the execution model, Richard Maine
- Re: sequence points and the execution model,
Terence
- Emacs' Flymake on-the-fly syntax checking, BIl Kleb
- Re: SUPRISE...!,
Sjouke Burry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- SUPRISE...!, enteringheaven
- Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?,
fortrangroup
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?,
Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, George
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?,
no_user
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, fj
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, fj
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Richard Maine
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, no_user
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?,
Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Gib Bogle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, George
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Tom Micevski
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, rusi_pathan
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, rusi_pathan
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Dan Nagle
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, rusi_pathan
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?, Victor Eijkhout
- Re: Is Co-Array the Future of Parallel Computing?,
Dan Nagle
- Capitalization style,
Peter C. Chapin
- Re: Capitalization style,
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Capitalization style,
Paul van Delst
- Re: Capitalization style, Richard Maine
- Re: Capitalization style, Ron Shepard
- Re: Capitalization style, Paul van Delst
- Re: Capitalization style,
Paul van Delst
- Re: Capitalization style,
Dave Allured
- Re: Capitalization style,
Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Capitalization style, makyo
- Re: Capitalization style, Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Capitalization style, Peter C. Chapin
- Re: Capitalization style, Dan Nagle
- Re: Capitalization style, robin
- Re: Capitalization style, Gordon Sande
- Re: Capitalization style, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Capitalization style, Gordon Sande
- Re: Capitalization style, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Capitalization style: far off topic!, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Capitalization style, JB
- Re: Capitalization style, robin
- Re: Capitalization style, Terence
- Re: Capitalization style,
Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Capitalization style,
Terence
- Re: Capitalization style,
Peter C. Chapin
- Re: Capitalization style, George
- Re: Capitalization style, Terence
- Re: Capitalization style,
Peter C. Chapin
- Re: Capitalization style,
Damian
- Re: Capitalization style, robin
- Re: Capitalization style,
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- OPTIONAL STRING argument problem,
zuying@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OPTIONAL STRING argument problem, James Van Buskirk
- Re: OPTIONAL STRING argument problem, robin
- Re: OPTIONAL STRING argument problem, Terence
- Fortran IV to F77, Terence
- Photran compiles but refuses to debug (MinGW-MSYS-g95), Arjan
- passing a string,
Luka Djigas
- Re: passing a string,
George
- Re: passing a string, Luka Djigas
- Re: passing a string, robin
- Re: passing a string,
George
- incorporating an index in a string, George
- infinite DO,
Charles Coldwell
- Re: infinite DO, Pierre Asselin
- Re: infinite DO,
George
- Re: infinite DO, robin
- Re: infinite DO, robin
- Re: infinite DO, David Flower
- New to Fortran on Win XP,
Matti
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP, e p chandler
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP,
Sebastian Gallinat
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP,
Beliavsky
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP, Matti
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP, Craig Powers
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP,
Beliavsky
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP,
Gib Bogle
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP, George
- Re: New to Fortran on Win XP, robin
- Read a line to variables from data file?,
Qiang Zhong
- Re: Read a line to variables from data file?, Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Read a line to variables from data file?,
Arjen Markus
- Re: Read a line to variables from data file?, michaelmetcalf
- passing by value in Fortran 90,
Damian
- Re: passing by value in Fortran 90, James Van Buskirk
- Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?,
Jason
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?,
GaryScott
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?,
Jason
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?, GaryScott
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?, GaryScott
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?, GaryScott
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?, GaryScott
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?, GaryScott
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?, George
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?,
Jason
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?, robin
- Re: Anybody can help me out on WRITE format?,
GaryScott
- Public/Private or gfortran problem?,
Chris Bradley
- Re: Public/Private or gfortran problem?, GaryScott
- Re: Public/Private or gfortran problem?,
GaryScott
- Message not available
- Re: Public/Private or gfortran problem?, GaryScott
- Re: Public/Private or gfortran problem?, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Public/Private or gfortran problem?, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Public/Private or gfortran problem?, Chris Bradley
- Message not available
- Re: iostat usage,
e p chandler
- Re: iostat usage,
Arjen Markus
- Re: iostat usage, Mike
- Re: iostat usage, Arjen Markus
- Re: iostat usage, Mike
- Re: iostat usage, Mike
- Re: iostat usage,
Arjen Markus
- Re: Problem, marek87
- Re: Problem, marek87
- Re: Problem,
Dave Allured
- Re: Problem,
marek87
- Re: Problem, Dave Allured
- Re: Problem, Terence
- Re: Problem, Thomas Koenig
- Re: Problem, Dave Allured
- Re: Problem, marek87
- Message not available
- Re: Problem, Terence
- Re: Problem, Dave Allured
- Re: Problem, Terence
- Re: Problem, marek87
- Re: Problem,
marek87
- Re: gfortran binaries for MinGW-Win32?, James Van Buskirk
- Re: gfortran binaries for MinGW-Win32?,
Tim Prince
- Re: gfortran binaries for MinGW-Win32?,
George
- Re: gfortran binaries for MinGW-Win32?, e p chandler
- Re: gfortran binaries for MinGW-Win32?, George
- Re: gfortran binaries for MinGW-Win32?, e p chandler
- Re: gfortran binaries for MinGW-Win32?,
George
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros,
Gordon Sande
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros,
robin
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros, Gordon Sande
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros, robin
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros,
robin
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros,
glen herrmannsfeldt
- Message not available
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros, Gary Scott
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros, robin
- Message not available
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros, robin
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros, Dave Allured
- Re: avoiding trailing zeros, robin
- Re: It is a bug of lapack 3.2 or of gfortran ?,
Tim Prince
- Re: It is a bug of lapack 3.2 or of gfortran ?, Julien Langou
- Re: max number of continuation lines,
fj
- Re: max number of continuation lines,
jfh
- Re: max number of continuation lines, Terence
- Re: max number of continuation lines, michaelmetcalf
- Re: max number of continuation lines, Terence
- RE: max number of continuation lines, meek
- Re: max number of continuation lines,
jfh
- Re: making plots, KevinK
- Re: making plots, baf
- Re: making plots, GaryScott
- Re: making plots, Ian
- Re: making plots, David Duffy
- Re: making plots, Luka Djigas
- Re: making plots, Arjen Markus
- Re: making plots, skip . knoble
- Re: Types with mutual references, Damian
- Re: Types with mutual references, Arjen Markus
- Re: Types with mutual references,
jel
- Re: Types with mutual references,
Damian
- Re: Types with mutual references, jel
- Re: Types with mutual references, Arjen Markus
- Re: Types with mutual references,
Damian
- Re: a tokyo photo,
George
- Re: a tokyo photo,
Steve Lionel
- Re: a tokyo photo, George
- Re: a tokyo photo,
Steve Lionel
- Re: a tokyo photo,
Ian
- Re: a tokyo photo, Dan Nagle
- Re: a tokyo photo, George
- Re: NAG compiler and SYSTEM, ACCESS, FLUSH, etc...,
Gordon Sande
- Re: NAG compiler and SYSTEM, ACCESS, FLUSH, etc...,
Thomas Robitaille
- Re: NAG compiler and SYSTEM, ACCESS, FLUSH, etc..., jfh
- Re: NAG compiler and SYSTEM, ACCESS, FLUSH, etc..., Gordon Sande
- Re: NAG compiler and SYSTEM, ACCESS, FLUSH, etc..., Thomas Robitaille
- Re: NAG compiler and SYSTEM, ACCESS, FLUSH, etc...,
Thomas Robitaille
- Re: ice melting,
William Asher
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: ice melting,
George
- Re: ice melting, William Asher
- Re: ice melting, George McBane
- Re: ice melting, William Asher
- Re: ice melting, michaelmetcalf
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: ice melting, George McBane
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: ice melting, George McBane
- Re: ice melting, Terence
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: ice melting, Terence
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: ice melting, Terence
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: ice melting, Terence
- Re: ice melting, Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: ice melting, George
- Re: Newbie F90 Question -- or may not be!,
robert . corbett
- Re: Newbie F90 Question -- or may not be!,
Ron Shepard
- Re: Newbie F90 Question -- or may not be!, robert . corbett
- Re: Newbie F90 Question -- or may not be!, robin
- Re: Newbie F90 Question -- or may not be!,
Ron Shepard
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules..., Craig Powers
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules..., Paul van Delst
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules...,
Jason Blevins
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules...,
Paul van Delst
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules..., Tobias Burnus
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules...,
Paul van Delst
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules..., Steven Correll
- Re: Fortran libraries & modules..., robin
- Re: compiler bug?,
Tobias Burnus
- Re: compiler bug?,
George
- Re: compiler bug?, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: compiler bug?, George
- Re: compiler bug?, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: compiler bug?, James Van Buskirk
- Re: compiler bug?, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: compiler bug?, James Van Buskirk
- Re: compiler bug?, mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: compiler bug?,
George
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character,
Dave Allured
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character,
Wolfi
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, dpb
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, dpb
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, Richard Maine
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, Wolfi
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, Dave Allured
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, Wolfi
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, Dave Allured
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, Klaus Wacker
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character, Dave Allured
- Re: fmt: read unexpected character,
Wolfi
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input, Gary Scott
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input,
Arjen Markus
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input,
Gordon Sande
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input, GaryScott
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input, Gordon Sande
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input, GaryScott
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input,
Gordon Sande
- Re: best practices for structuring ASCII input, Dave Allured
- Re: Redux: Was there a negative real zero possibility in early Fortran?, Gordon Sande
- Re: Redux: Was there a negative real zero possibility in early Fortran?, Jim
- Re: Redux: Was there a negative real zero possibility in early Fortran?, robert . corbett
- Re: Redux: Was there a negative real zero possibility in early Fortran?, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
Jason Blevins
- Re: Command-line argument capture, Gary Scott
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
George
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
user1
- Re: Command-line argument capture, George
- Re: Command-line argument capture, Terence
- Re: Command-line argument capture, George
- Re: Command-line argument capture, Terence
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
user1
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
Richard Maine
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
Terence
- Re: Command-line argument capture, Gordon Sande
- Re: Command-line argument capture, Richard Maine
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
Terence
- Re: Command-line argument capture, e p chandler
- WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, user1
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Kevin G. Rhoads
- RE: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, meek
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, user1
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, e p chandler
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, GaryScott
- RE: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, meek
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, user1
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, e p chandler
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Gary Scott
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: (OT) old compilers and hardware, user1
- Re: (OT) old compilers and hardware, Terence
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, user1
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, e p chandler
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Terence
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Gary Scott
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, GaryScott
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Peter C. Chapin
- Re: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, Terence
- RE: WatFor77 -- Re: Command-line argument capture, meek
- Re: Command-line argument capture,
Terence
- Re: Command-line argument capture, John
- Re: Passing type-bound procedures as arguments?,
Reinhold Bader
- Re: Passing type-bound procedures as arguments?,
Jason Blevins
- Re: Passing type-bound procedures as arguments?, Reinhold Bader
- Re: Passing type-bound procedures as arguments?,
Jason Blevins
- Re: Autojen m?r? Kiinassa/Usa: ssa, Richard Maine
- Re: populating arrays,
Jason Blevins
- Re: populating arrays,
George
- Re: populating arrays, Jason Blevins
- Re: populating arrays, George
- Re: populating arrays, George
- Re: populating arrays, George
- Re: populating arrays, user1
- Re: populating arrays, George
- Re: populating arrays, user1
- Re: populating arrays, George
- Re: populating arrays, user1
- Re: populating arrays, George
- Re: populating arrays, user1
- Re: populating arrays, Ron Shepard
- Re: Fortran sleep function ???, user1
- Re: Fortran sleep function ???, Gary Scott
- Re: populating arrays, e p chandler
- Re: populating arrays,
George
- Re: populating arrays,
Dick Hendrickson
- Re: populating arrays, George
- Re: Fortran 2003,
Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran 2003,
Cliff
- Re: Fortran 2003, Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran 2003, George
- Re: Fortran 2003,
Cliff
- Re: Fortran 2003,
Simulate
- Re: Fortran 2003, Cliff
- Re: Fortran 2003,
Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran 2003, Cliff
- Re: Fortran 2003, George
- Re: Fortran 2003, Paul van Delst
- Re: Fortran 2003, Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran 2003, George
- Re: Fortran 2003, Damian
- Re: pointer to a protected variable,
Richard Maine
- Re: pointer to a protected variable,
mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: pointer to a protected variable, Richard Maine
- Re: pointer to a protected variable, Richard Maine
- Re: pointer to a protected variable, mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: pointer to a protected variable, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: pointer to a protected variable,
mrestelli@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Autojen määrä Kiinassa/Usa: ssa,
Terence
- Re: Autojen määrä Kiinassa/Usa: ssa, sigvaldi
- Re: Autojen määrä Kiinassa/Usa: ssa,
JB
- Re: Autojen määrä Kiinassa/Usa: ssa, Jan Gerrit Kootstra
- Re: read data form file,
Arjen Markus
- Re: read data form file,
nakisa
- Re: read data form file, Dan Nagle
- Re: read data form file, nakisa
- Re: read data form file, nakisa
- Re: read data form file, Gordon Sande
- Re: read data form file, nakisa
- Re: read data form file, Gordon Sande
- Re: read data form file, Richard Maine
- Re: read data form file, nakisa
- Re: read data form file, Richard Maine
- Re: read data form file, Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: read data form file, Gordon Sande
- Re: read data form file, Dave Allured
- Re: read data form file, James Van Buskirk
- Re: read data form file, e p chandler
- Re: read data form file, Richard Maine
- Re: read data form file, Alois Steindl
- Re: read data form file, nakisa
- Re: read data form file, Jim
- Re: read data form file,
nakisa
- Re: computing gradient,
Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: computing gradient, Mike
- Re: computing gradient,
Fred
- Re: computing gradient, Mike
- Re: scope of variable,
michaelmetcalf
- Re: scope of variable,
AnotherSquid
- Re: scope of variable, Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: scope of variable, Mike
- Re: scope of variable, Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: scope of variable, Mike
- Re: scope of variable, Richard Maine
- Re: scope of variable, Mike
- Re: scope of variable, Richard Maine
- Re: scope of variable, Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: scope of variable, Mike
- Re: scope of variable, Mike
- Re: scope of variable,
Mike
- Re: scope of variable, Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: scope of variable,
AnotherSquid
- Re: scope of variable,
Arjen Markus
- Re: scope of variable, Mike
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?,
Gib Bogle
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?,
George
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, Gib Bogle
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?,
ucfjohn11
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, robin
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, ucfjohn11
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, Sjouke Burry
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, ucfjohn11
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, e p chandler
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, George
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?,
George
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?,
e p chandler
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?,
ucfjohn11
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, ucfjohn11
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, user1
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, Tobias Burnus
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, Arjen Markus
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, user1
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, ucfjohn11
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, Richard Maine
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, e p chandler
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, GaryScott
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, Richard Maine
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, GaryScott
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?, Craig Powers
- Re: exam REVIEW...can anyone help me?,
ucfjohn11
- Re: Passing string from fortran 90 to cpp dll, Arjen Markus
- Re: Passing string from fortran 90 to cpp dll, Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: FORTRAN 77 blank lines in formatted write, Richard Maine
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments, Tobias Burnus
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments,
adda
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments,
Tobias Burnus
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments, Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments, jfh
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: gfortran compiler error: pointer arguments,
Tobias Burnus
- Re: null argument,
Arjen Markus
- Re: null argument,
Mike
- Re: null argument, Arjen Markus
- Re: null argument, Mike
- Re: null argument, Arjen Markus
- Re: null argument, Mike
- Re: null argument, Arjen Markus
- Re: null argument, Catherine Rees Lay
- [OT] Re: null argument, Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: [OT] Re: null argument, Catherine Rees Lay
- Re: null argument, Mike
- Re: null argument, Mike
- Re: null argument, Catherine Rees Lay
- Re: null argument, Mike
- Re: null argument,
Mike
- Re: null argument, Arjen Markus
- Re: null argument, Richard Maine
- Re: null argument, Arjen Markus
- Re: null argument,
Mike
- Re: BMD source program errors,
e p chandler
- Re: BMD source program errors, Terence
- Re: BMD source program errors, George
- Re: BMD source program errors,
robin
- Re: BMD source program errors, Terence
- Message not available
- Re: Unallocated Allocatable as Dummy Argument to be Allocated inside Subroutine,
reubendb
- Message not available
- Re: Unallocated Allocatable as Dummy Argument to be Allocated inside Subroutine, Tobias Burnus
- Re: Unallocated Allocatable as Dummy Argument to be Allocated inside Subroutine, reubendb
- Re: Unallocated Allocatable as Dummy Argument to be Allocated inside Subroutine, Paul van Delst
- Re: Unallocated Allocatable as Dummy Argument to be Allocated inside Subroutine, Ian Bush
- Re: Unallocated Allocatable as Dummy Argument to be Allocated inside Subroutine,
reubendb
- Re: general F90/F95 code to read netCDF 4.x files?, rusi_pathan
- Re: INCLUDEing subroutines in modules, Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Private return type of public functions,
Reinhold Bader
- Re: Private return type of public functions,
Bálint Aradi
- Re: Private return type of public functions, Reinhold Bader
- Re: Private return type of public functions, Richard Maine
- Re: Private return type of public functions, Reinhold Bader
- Re: Private return type of public functions, Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Private return type of public functions, Bálint Aradi
- Re: Private return type of public functions, Paul van Delst
- Re: Private return type of public functions,
Bálint Aradi
- Re: St. Venants equation,
George
- Re: St. Venants equation, Richard Maine
- Re: St. Venants equation,
Arjen Markus
- Re: St. Venants equation, fj
- Re: St. Venants equation, OldSchool
- Re: St. Venants equation, George
- Re: 77 to 90/95 assignment question., Richard Maine
- Re: 77 to 90/95 assignment question.,
Dave Allured
- Re: 77 to 90/95 assignment question., Dave Allured
- Re: 77 to 90/95 assignment question., B
- Re: 77 to 90/95 assignment question., David Flower
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order,
michaelmetcalf
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order,
dean . menezes
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order, dean . menezes
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order,
dean . menezes
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order,
Ron Shepard
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order,
George
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order, George
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order,
George
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order, Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran Spec -- Evaluation Order, Dave Allured
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement,
michaelmetcalf
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement,
W. Brenig
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, michaelmetcalf
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, Tim Prince
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, W. Brenig
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, Tim Prince
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, michaelmetcalf
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, nmm1
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, W. Brenig
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement, Steve Lionel
- Re: Wrong FORMAT statement,
W. Brenig
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?,
Tim Prince
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?,
Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?,
Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, Ron Shepard
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?,
nmm1
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?,
Dan Nagle
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, nmm1
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, Dan Nagle
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, nmm1
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?,
Dan Nagle
- Re: why were these intrinsics in FORTRAN?, jfh
- Re: BLOCK/END BLOCK F2008,
e p chandler
- Re: BLOCK/END BLOCK F2008, Gary Scott
- Re: BLOCK/END BLOCK F2008, nmm1
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
nmm1
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127, nmm1
- Re: IOSTAT=127, tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
Tobias Burnus
- Re: IOSTAT=127, tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
Luksa
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127, Luksa
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127, Charles Coldwell
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
Charles Coldwell
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: IOSTAT=127, tholen
- Re: IOSTAT=127, jfh
- Re: IOSTAT=127, nmm1
- Re: IOSTAT=127,
tholen
- Re: fortran standard,
Tobias Burnus
- Re: fortran standard, George
- Re: fortran standard,
Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran standard,
robert . corbett
- Re: fortran standard, George
- Re: fortran standard,
George
- Re: fortran standard, Gary Scott
- Re: fortran standard,
robert . corbett
- Re: Question about initializing module variables,
Richard Maine
- Re: Question about initializing module variables,
B
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, Richard Maine
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, B
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, Gordon Sande
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, Arjan
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, nmm1
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, B
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, nmm1
- Re: Question about initializing module variables, David Thompson
- Re: Question about initializing module variables,
B
- Re: allocatable scalar in f2003,
James Van Buskirk
- Re: allocatable scalar in f2003, Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable scalar in f2003, George
- Re: allocatable scalar in f2003,
Damian
- Re: allocatable scalar in f2003,
Richard Maine
- Re: allocatable scalar in f2003, Damian
- Re: allocatable scalar in f2003,
Richard Maine
- BMD07M.FOR now working!, Terence
- Duplicated (ignore), Terence
- Re: Using Definition Files w/ Subroutines in a Module,
John Keenan
- Re: Using Definition Files w/ Subroutines in a Module, brady . m . adams
- Re: Random Number Generator compling,
Fred
- Re: Random Number Generator compling,
Gordon Sande
- Re: Random Number Generator compling, Craig Powers
- Re: Random Number Generator compling,
Gordon Sande
- Re: Installing Intel Fortran 90/95, Luksa
- Re: Installing Intel Fortran 90/95, Tim Prince
- Re: ASA Carriage Control Characters, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: ASA Carriage Control Characters,
OldSchool
- Re: ASA Carriage Control Characters, Thomas Koenig
- Re: Does deallocate also nullify a pointer ?,
Richard Maine
- Re: Does deallocate also nullify a pointer ?,
reubendb
- Re: Does deallocate also nullify a pointer ?, Richard Maine
- Re: Does deallocate also nullify a pointer ?, reubendb
- Re: Does deallocate also nullify a pointer ?, nmm1
- Re: Does deallocate also nullify a pointer ?,
reubendb
- Re: compiler option for local variables to default to automatic not working,
Richard Maine
- Re: compiler option for local variables to default to automatic not working, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: compiler option for local variables to default to automatic not working, Craig Powers
- Re: compiler option for local variables to default to automatic not working, Steven Correll
- Re: Horror program uncovered from 1965!, Richard Maine
- Re: Horror program uncovered from 1965!, James Parsly
- Re: Horror program uncovered from 1965!,
mecej4
- Re: Horror program uncovered from 1965!, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Horror program uncovered from 1965!, robin
- Re: Passing Strings from C#,
Gary Scott
- Re: Passing Strings from C#,
Vic
- Re: Passing Strings from C#, Gary Scott
- Re: Passing Strings from C#,
Vic
- Re: Passing Strings from C#, Gary Scott
- Re: Passing Strings from C#, Vic
- Re: Passing Strings from C#,
Vic
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Passing Strings from C#, Vic
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file,
Gary Scott
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file,
Gary Scott
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file, Gary Scott
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file, Lorents
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file, Gary Scott
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file, nmm1
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file,
Gary Scott
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file,
Luksa
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file,
Lorents
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file, Richard Maine
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file, Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file,
Lorents
- Re: Deleting a byte at the end of a file, user1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing,
e p chandler
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing,
Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Terence
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, e p chandler
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Gary Scott
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, James Van Buskirk
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Ron Shepard
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, David Thompson
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Ron Shepard
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Richard Maine
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Ron Shepard
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, David Thompson
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, James Van Buskirk
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, James Van Buskirk
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, James Van Buskirk
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, James Van Buskirk
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, James Van Buskirk
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Craig Powers
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, dpb
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Gary Scott
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, dpb
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Steve Lionel
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Gary Scott
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Steve Lionel
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Steve Lionel
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Dan Nagle
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Steve Lionel
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, James Van Buskirk
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Steve Lionel
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Steve Lionel
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Richard Maine
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Jan Vorbrüggen
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, nmm1
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Charles Coldwell
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, GaryScott
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing,
Gary Scott
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Terence
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, Gary Scott
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing,
Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing,
pixel
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing,
Terence
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, e p chandler
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, dpb
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing,
Terence
- Re: COMMON structures and text parsing, robin
- Re: conjunction junction, George
- Re: good intro book?,
rudra
- Re: good intro book?, thepixelfreak
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook, George
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook,
Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook,
jfh
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook, jfh
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook, Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook, George
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook, Gary Scott
- Re: Fortran 2003 Handbook,
jfh
- Re: CLASS Terminology,
Gary Scott
- Re: CLASS Terminology, George
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CLASS Terminology,
George
- Re: CLASS Terminology, Reinhold Bader
- Re: CLASS Terminology, George
- Re: Using a 2-D Array,
Mark Westwood
- Re: Using a 2-D Array,
Bobbyj124
- Re: Using a 2-D Array, George
- Re: Using a 2-D Array, dpb
- Re: Using a 2-D Array,
Bobbyj124
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Using a 2-D Array, Arno
- Re: Using a 2-D Array, Bobbyj124
- Re: Using a 2-D Array, Bobbyj124
- Re: Using a 2-D Array, e p chandler
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Tokyo meeting,
Steve Lionel
- Re: Tokyo meeting, George
- Re: Tokyo meeting,
George
- Re: Tokyo meeting, Gary Scott
- Re: Tokyo meeting,
nmm1
- Re: Tokyo meeting, Gary Scott
- Re: Tokyo meeting, George
- Re: Tokyo meeting,
Steve Lionel
- Re: Tokyo meeting, Gary Scott
- Re: Tokyo meeting,
Ian Bush
- Re: Tokyo meeting, Jan Vorbrüggen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: reducing the size of an array w/o using twice the memory ?, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure], nmm1
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure],
Gary Scott
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure],
Richard Maine
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure], Gary Scott
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure],
Dan Nagle
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure], Gary Scott
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure], nmm1
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure], Gary Scott
- Re: Threads [was Re: Final Procedure],
Richard Maine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: calling a function once works, calling it twice fails, Catherine Rees Lay
- Re: calling a function once works, calling it twice fails, robin
- Re: subroytine not linking,
Tobias Burnus
- Re: subroytine not linking, Arjen Markus
- Re: subroytine not linking, e p chandler
- Re: link f77 compiled routines with f95, Richard Maine
- Re: link f77 compiled routines with f95, user1
- Re: link f77 compiled routines with f95,
robert . corbett
- Re: link f77 compiled routines with f95,
markus_helfer
- Re: link f77 compiled routines with f95, user1
- Re: link f77 compiled routines with f95, robert . corbett
- Re: link f77 compiled routines with f95,
markus_helfer
- Re: fortran and hex readers, e p chandler
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook, Richard Maine
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook,
George
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook,
Gary Scott
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook, George
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook, dpb
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook, George
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook, Gary Scott
- Re: The Fortran 2003 Handbook,
Gary Scott
- Re: PROCEDURE with implicit interface as actual argument, Richard Maine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PROCEDURE with implicit interface as actual argument,
Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: PROCEDURE with implicit interface as actual argument,
Richard Maine
- Re: PROCEDURE with implicit interface as actual argument, paul . richard . thomas
- Re: PROCEDURE with implicit interface as actual argument, Glen Herrmannsfeldt
- Re: PROCEDURE with implicit interface as actual argument,
Richard Maine
- Re: RAM access limits under 64bit, Steve Lionel