comp.lang.fortran
- Re: Reading direct-access files is slow with Intel Fortran?
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Reading direct-access files is slow with Intel Fortran?
- From: JB
- Re: sloppy-char flag strangeness
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- sloppy-char flag strangeness
- From: Norminator
- Re: GDB print array in a module
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: solve of a equation
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: solve of a equation
- From: Damian
- Re: solve of a equation
- From: Arjen Markus
- solve of a equation
- From: Elaheh
- Re: GDB print array in a module
- From: jerryx
- Re: Reading direct-access files is slow with Intel Fortran?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Reading direct-access files is slow with Intel Fortran?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: kis
- Re: GDB print array in a module
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Reading direct-access files is slow with Intel Fortran?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Ron Shepard
- GDB print array in a module
- From: jerryx
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: jerryx
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: ken . fairfield
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: TideMan
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: kis
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: jfh
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: ken . fairfield
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: Craig Powers
- Subroutines in Separate Files
- From: kis
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: nmm1
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Florian Buerzle
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Florian Buerzle
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Dave Allured
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: nmm1
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Subroutine as Optional Argument to other subroutine
- From: reubendb
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Subroutine as Optional Argument to other subroutine
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Subroutine as Optional Argument to other subroutine
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: robin
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: robin
- Subroutine as Optional Argument to other subroutine
- From: reubendb
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Florian Buerzle
- Re: linking error
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: linking error
- From: leila . taghizadeh
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Dave Allured
- Re: linking error
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: linking error
- From: mecej4
- Re: linking error
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Florian Buerzle
- linking error
- From: leila . taghizadeh
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Arjan
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: unsigned integer
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: Craig Powers
- unsigned integer
- From: Florian Buerzle
- Re: SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: Mark F
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Peter
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: user1
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Peter
- Re: usinglibrary
- From: rudra
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: jfh
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Peter
- Re: usinglibrary
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: Leslie Ballentine
- Lahey releases 7.2 for Windows today, but is it really new?
- From: Al Greynolds
- Data Typists Needed ! Work from home, Great Income!
- From: monasapna@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: Richard Maine
- SUBROUTINE and real kind definition
- From: Lurkos
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Lurkos
- Re: substring assignment in fortran, C, etc.
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: overloaded function and (apparently) recursive calls
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: overloaded function and (apparently) recursive calls
- From: michaelmetcalf
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: overloaded function and (apparently) recursive calls
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: overloaded function and (apparently) recursive calls
- From: m
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: overloaded function and (apparently) recursive calls
- From: michaelmetcalf
- overloaded function and (apparently) recursive calls
- From: m
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: David Thompson
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: David Thompson
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Arjen Markus
- a comment operator in fortran
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: USE inside MODULE
- From: Steve Lionel
- USE inside MODULE
- From: Lurkos
- Re: Allocating Multiple arrays
- From: Dan Nagle
- Allocating Multiple arrays
- From: VICTOR
- usinglibrary
- From: rudra
- Re: Allocatable arrays
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: exponential of matrix in fortran90
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: Gordon Sande
- Memorial Day Specials, 2 Days Only: Sunday - Monday (5/24-5/25).
- From: fighter
- Re: Allocatable arrays
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Allocatable arrays
- From: michaelmetcalf
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: JB
- Re: exponential of matrix in fortran90
- From: nmm1
- exponential of matrix in fortran90
- From: elaheh . adibi
- Re: Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: Bil Kleb
- Re: Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: Bil Kleb
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robin
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robin
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: robin
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: robin
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: TideMan
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robin
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: PeterOut
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: ken . fairfield
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: TideMan
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: jfh
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: jfh
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: PeterOut
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: nmm1
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: SPAM attack!
- From: Steve Lionel
- Array Dimensions Change When Passed as Argument
- From: PeterOut
- SPAM attack!
- From: Arjan
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robin
- Re: Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: Peter
- Re: Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: nmm1
- Autodocumentation type functionality for Fortran?
- From: JustAnotherFamily
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: nmm1
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Infinity77
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: FX
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Ian Bush
- OnGuard PitBull DT 5005 Bicycle U-Lock and Extra Security Cable
- From: Aly
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Franken Sense
- 3M Sanding Belts
- From: Arispe
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robin
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: jfh
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: robin
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: Jason Riedy
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Infinity77
- Dads & Grads Superstore
- From: best
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Infinity77
- Re: Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Richard Maine
- Unformatted, big-endian files and fseek
- From: Infinity77
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: robin
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: robin
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: Clive Page
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: substring assignment in fortran, C, etc.
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: ANSI x3.21-1967?
- From: mecej4
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ??standard
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: ANSI x3.21-1967?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: scope rule + variable initialization question
- From: Van Snyder
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ??standard
- From: Van Snyder
- Re: ANSI x3.21-1967?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Van Snyder
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Van Snyder
- ANSI x3.21-1967?
- From: Van Snyder
- Re: substring assignment in fortran, C, etc.
- From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
- Leading zero for printing real numbers
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: It doesn't help to assume the poster is always wrong!
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: g95 expects right parenthesis?
- From: Brian Flaherty
- Re: g95 expects right parenthesis?
- From: Louis Krupp
- Re: g95 expects right parenthesis?
- From: michaelmetcalf
- g95 expects right parenthesis?
- From: Brian Flaherty
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Carlie Coats
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Colin Watters
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ??standard
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: It doesn't help to assume the poster is always wrong!
- From: Damian
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Carlie Coats
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: substring assignment in fortran, C, etc.
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ??standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ??standard
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ??standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: nmm1
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: nmm1
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: nmm1
- Re: substring assignment in fortran, C, etc.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran ?standard
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Carlie Coats
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: nmm1
- Re: Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: nmm1
- Problem converting external routine to internal
- From: Carlie Coats
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Canon Ef 15mm F 2.8 Fisheye Lens For Canon Slr
- From: Athanasiou
- Re: It doesn't help to assume the poster is always wrong!
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: A "simple" routine used in 30-odd programs which is probably wrong!
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: It doesn't help to assume the poster is always wrong!
- From: Terence
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Terence
- Re: It doesn't help to assume the poster is always wrong!
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: It doesn't help to assume the poster is always wrong!
- From: Ron Shepard
- It doesn't help to assume the poster is always wrong!
- From: Terence
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Terence
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: A "simple" routine used in 30-odd programs which is probably wrong!
- From: Terence
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Terence
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: robin
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: problem with unhandled exception (acces violation) and undefined array/pointer
- From: kuco
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: problem with unhandled exception (acces violation) and undefined array/pointer
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: problem with unhandled exception (acces violation) and undefined array/pointer
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Fix for intel v11.0 compiler bug available?
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: Richard Maine
- problem with unhandled exception (acces violation) and undefined array/pointer
- From: kuco
- Precision of literal real constants, parameters, and Fortran standard
- From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: Fix for intel v11.0 compiler bug available?
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Fix for intel v11.0 compiler bug available?
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Fix for intel v11.0 compiler bug available?
- From: Bil Kleb
- wholesale Ed Hardy Silk Scarves (WWW.EDHARDY4sale.COM) Ed Hardy Scarf
- From: edhardy4sale
- Fix for intel v11.0 compiler bug available?
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: dpb
- Re: A "simple" routine used in 30-odd programs which is probably wrong!
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: A "simple" routine used in 30-odd programs which is probably wrong!
- From: Terence
- Home Theater Gateway
- From: Ausland
- Re: A "simple" routine used in 30-odd programs which is probably wrong!
- From: Arjen Markus
- Wall Mounted Home Theater Speakers
- From: Armout
- Hdtv Lcd Cheap
- From: Aumen
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: bru
- Hdtv Wall Mount Arm
- From: Anagnos
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Terence
- A "simple" routine used in 30-odd programs which is probably wrong!
- From: Terence
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Terence
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: how to allocate a array in subroutine
- From: robin
- About Hdtv
- From: Abdin
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: viper-2
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: R Vowels
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: R Vowels
- Asus Eee Notebook
- From: Attard
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: dpb
- nike clothing,nike shoes,online store,http://www.maidi2008.net air Jordan Shoes,Nike Air Jordans, Air Force Ones,Retro Air Jordan, Bape Hoodies,Bape shoes-Tencent Traveler|Jordan Shoes,Nike Air Jordans, Air Force Ones,Retro Air Jordan, Bape Hood
- From: nikeshose26
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Terence
- Re: scope rule + variable initialization question
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Franken Sense
- scope rule + variable initialization question
- From: yosuke kimura
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Order of parameters in early SIGN(A,B) function?
- From: Terence
- Re: Free and Commercial Compilers
- From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Gary Scott
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: viper-2
- Cheap Macbook
- From: Applegate
- Free and Commercial Compilers
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: how to allocate a array in subroutine
- From: e p chandler
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: kargls
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Walt Brainerd
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: nmm1
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: kargls
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: nmm1
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: how to allocate a array in subroutine
- From: leed
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: G
- Fortran/TK (using Open Watcom Fortran 77)
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: bru
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: FX
- How to initialise arrays to zero?
- From: bru
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: G
- Re: how to allocate a array in subroutine
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: how to allocate a array in subroutine
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- how to allocate a array in subroutine
- From: leed
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: robert . corbett
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: robin
- Re: A generic linked list in Fortran 95
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: baf
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: J. F. Cornwall
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: J. F. Cornwall
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: J. F. Cornwall
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: JB
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: jbenjam
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: A generic linked list in Fortran 95
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: jbenjam
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: Luka Djigas
- A generic linked list in Fortran 95
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- organizing and handling multiple code chunks/subroutines/modules
- From: Ben
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: kargls
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Dave Allured
- Ifort and gfortran behavior.
- From: G
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: viper-2
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: generate pdf from fortran
- From: John
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: viper-2
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: viper-2
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: dpb
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: viper-2
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: dpb
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: GaryScott
- Re: fortran.com web site
- From: Luka Djigas
- fortran.com web site
- From: Walt Brainerd
- Re: INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: sumesh.pt
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Erik Toussaint
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: David Duffy
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: generate pdf from fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, ?segfault
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: happygdk
- Re: INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: Dave Allured
- Re: INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: Dave Allured
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: generate pdf from fortran
- From: Daniel Kraft
- Re: generate pdf from fortran
- From: kadan
- Re: INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: Arjen Markus
- INQUIRE - returns TRUE for non-existing unit!
- From: sumesh.pt
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: happygdk
- Re: generate pdf from fortran
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, ?segfault
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: happygdk
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: generate pdf from fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: calling a function that returns a c_char from python
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: michaelmetcalf
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: generate pdf from fortran
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Jason Blevins
- generate pdf from fortran
- From: kadan
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: viper-2
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- Re: Errors in Mixed-language Application between IVF and VS2005
- From: ivan
- Re: IVF and vs2005
- From: ivan
- Errors in Mixed-language Application between IVF and VS2005
- From: ivan
- Re: IVF and vs2005
- From: ivan
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- Re: Declaration order
- From: nmm1
- Re: Declaration order
- From: nmm1
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: robin
- Re: Declaration order
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Declaration order
- From: jfh
- Re: Declaration order
- From: nmm1
- Re: Declaration order
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Declaration order
- From: nmm1
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Declaration order
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Some newbye questions
- From: Lurkos
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Declaration order
- From: nmm1
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Lurkos
- Re: Some newbye questions
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Declaration order
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Declaration order
- From: nmm1
- Re: Declaration order
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Declaration order
- From: nmm1
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Declaration order
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Declaration order
- From: makis
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: robin
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: robin
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: robin
- Re: literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: robin
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Declaration order
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Declaration order
- From: michaelmetcalf
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Declaration order
- From: David Flower
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: Dan Nagle
- Declaration order
- From: makis
- Re: Problem linking 32-bit lapack on linux 64-bit with intel fortran compiler
- From: Omaha
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Terence
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Terence
- Re: call system help
- From: Terence
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: John
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: happygdk
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- pointer, equivalence, common block, 32bit code, ifort v11 64bit, segfault
- From: happygdk
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: For opaque syntax Fortran has nothing on C++
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: John
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Fortran by-reference, was Re: A doubly linked-list in C
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: linking lapack compiled with g77 with a g90 fortran program
- From: kargls
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: kargls
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Richard Maine
- linking lapack compiled with g77 with a g90 fortran program
- From: John Smith
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: dpb
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: reubendb
- Re: rank mismatch for unused dummy arguments
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: rank mismatch for unused dummy arguments
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: FX
- Re: literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: kargls
- example of KIND to replace DOUBLE PRECISION
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- Re: Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: rank mismatch for unused dummy arguments
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: alexei . matveev
- literal integers in double precision expressions
- From: alexei . matveev
- Problems returning a C char type to Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: John
- Re: rank mismatch for unused dummy arguments
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: call system help
- From: OldSchool
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: russell
- Re: call system help
- From: viper-2
- Re: rank mismatch for unused dummy arguments
- From: Daniel Franke
- Re: rank mismatch for unused dummy arguments
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- rank mismatch for unused dummy arguments
- From: Daniel Franke
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: optional routine arguments
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- optional routine arguments
- From: LC's No-Spam Newsreading account
- For opaque syntax Fortran has nothing on C++
- From: Clive Page
- Problem linking 32-bit lapack on linux 64-bit with intel fortran compiler
- From: Frédéric Delanoy
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Louis Krupp
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Ragu
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: robin
- Re: call system help
- From: kargls
- Re: call system help
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Jomar Bueyes
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: TideMan
- MTL, Lapack and Visual C++
- From: Korchkidu
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: mecej4
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: TideMan
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: TideMan
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: call system help
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: call system help
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: dpb
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: call system help
- From: viper-2
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: call system help
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Alois Steindl
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Walter Spector
- Re: call system help
- From: Les Neilson
- Re: call system help
- From: viper-2
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: wim
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: call system help
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: call system help
- From: viper-2
- Re: call system help
- From: dpb
- Re: call system help
- From: rudra
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: dpb
- Re: IVF and vs2005
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: call system help
- From: dpb
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: Steve Lionel
- IVF and vs2005
- From: ivan
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: fj
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: Alois Steindl
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: JB
- Syntax error with open in gfortran
- From: TideMan
- Re: call system help
- From: rudra
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Louis Krupp
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: gfortran compiler design document
- From: paul . richard . thomas
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: David Thompson
- Re: Howto pass derived type arguments to C-Functions
- From: David Thompson
- Re: general matrix transposition
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- general matrix transposition
- From: Terence
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: Terence
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Terence
- Re: Are Fortran 90 arrrays contiguous in memory?
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: nuclear . wingnut
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: David Duffy
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: A Watcher
- help please...Trying to get a fortran file to work on windows vista
- From: naartjiej
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Are Fortran 90 arrrays contiguous in memory?
- From: Carl Christian Kjelgaard Mikkelsen
- Re: Unallocated Components & Type Arrays
- From: Jared Ahern
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Ragu
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: dpb
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Are Fortran 90 arrrays contiguous in memory?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: dpb
- Re: Are Fortran 90 arrrays contiguous in memory?
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: call system help
- From: OldSchool
- Re: call system help
- From: dpb
- Re: call system help
- From: Dave Allured
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: user1
- Are Fortran 90 arrrays contiguous in memory?
- From: Carl Christian Kjelgaard Mikkelsen
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: GaryScott
- Re: checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: Dave Allured
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Dave Allured
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: call system help
- From: rudra
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Ragu
- Re: EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Paul van Delst
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- EOF during Internal List-Directed Read
- From: Ragu
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: dpb
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Michael Murphy
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: user1
- Re: call system help
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: call system help
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: call system help
- From: rudra
- Re: call system help
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- Re: call system help
- From: Ian Bush
- Re: checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: Ian Bush
- checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: Bart Vandewoestyne
- call system help
- From: rudra
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- RE: checking where sqrt(-1) occurs
- From: meek
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: gfortran compiler design document
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: James
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: robin
- Re: EQUIVALENCE statement
- From: robin
- Re: "Classical Fortran" Second Edition
- From: robin
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: robin
- gfortran compiler design document
- From: fort_comp
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: JB
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: John
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Jugoslav Dujic
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: GaryScott
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: David Duffy
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: kargls
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: FX
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: dpb
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: dpb
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: user1
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Dick Hendrickson
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: robin
- Re: 50 years of progress in the language
- From: dpb
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: dpb
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Clive Page
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: 50 years of progress in the language
- From: JussiJ
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: michaelmetcalf
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: e p chandler
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: kargls
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: kargls
- Re: Optimisation and INTENT
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Optimisation and INTENT
- From: FX
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: user1
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: analyst41
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Clive Page
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: skorpio11@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: e p chandler
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: James Van Buskirk
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Luka Djigas
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: skorpio11@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: kargls
- An array of arbitrary dimensions made from [0,1]?
- From: skorpio11@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fortran Wiki
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: Franken Sense
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: dpb
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: VICTOR
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Accessing a specific part of a file
- From: VICTOR
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: fj
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Gary Scott
- Fortran Wiki
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Craig Powers
- Re: Warning: Fortran 95 does not allow an expression to be used as part of the format list
- From: robin
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: robin
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Clive Page
- Re: type declaration of function names and interfaces
- From: Giorgio Pastore
- Re: Procedure Pointer (Components) with no explicit interface and with implicit typing
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: Procedure Pointer (Components) with no explicit interface and with implicit typing
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: type declaration of function names and interfaces
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Jason Blevins
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Jason Blevins
- type declaration of function names and interfaces
- From: Giorgio Pastore
- Re: Procedure Pointer (Components) with no explicit interface and with implicit typing
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Get Key Function?
- From: Jason Blevins
- Get Key Function?
- From: nuclear . wingnut
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: Dan Nagle
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: robin
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: robin
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: robin
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: robin
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: robin
- RE: Get Key Function?
- From: meek
- Re: Floating point
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: mecej4
- Re: Warning: Fortran 95 does not allow an expression to be used as part of the format list
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: P Vincent
- Re: Floating point
- From: Arjen Markus
- Procedure Pointer (Components) with no explicit interface and with implicit typing
- From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Floating point
- From: Arjen Markus
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: Ron Shepard
- Re: Warning: Fortran 95 does not allow an expression to be used as part of the format list
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Warning: Fortran 95 does not allow an expression to be used as part of the format list
- From: dpb
- Re: Warning: Fortran 95 does not allow an expression to be used as part of the format list
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Warning: Fortran 95 does not allow an expression to be used as part of the format list
- From: Steve Lionel
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: hwongsma
- Re: f77 install on gygwin
- From: Ian
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: Arjan
- Re: implementation of power function in fortran
- From: mecej4
- implementation of power function in fortran
- From: hwongsma
- Complex to real: DBLE, REAL, DIMAG and AIMAG.
- From: P Vincent
Loading