Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: mecej4 <mecej4_no_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:14:27 0600
nmm1@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
In article <f94369954e6e42ca8f7de8d144891f1b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
TideMan <mulgor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 3, 8:23=A0pm, frank <fr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:45:47 0500, user1 wrote:It was intermediate school (=3Djunior high in US?) for me and I rememberThey should also learn how to do square roots by hand.I swear I learned how to do this in high school but completely forget the
method. =A0How does it go?
that you have to pair off the digits from the right, but then what?
As usual, Google can tell us:
http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/sqg/dads/HTML/squareRoot.html
It's also a stupid way to do it, and has been for 300 years.
One can justify changing that to "3,000 years" if one is willing to take Heron's (Heron of Alexandria, Century 1) word that the Babylonians knew the use of x_{n+1} = (x_n + N/x_n)/2 .
 mecej4
Solving.
the equation x^2 = a is FAR better, whether you use binary chop,
NewtonRaphson or iterative linear interpolation. And, yes, you
can do any of those in your head with a little practice.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: Ron Shepard
 Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: nmm1
 Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 References:
 Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: Florian Xaver
 Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: user1
 Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: frank
 Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: TideMan
 Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 From: nmm1
 Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 Prev by Date: Re: New to fortran please Help!
 Next by Date: Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 Previous by thread: Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 Next by thread: Re: Fortran vs. Octave/Matlab
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
