Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: "Gary L. Scott" <garylscott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 08:07:36 -0600
On 2/6/2011 3:37 AM, FX wrote:
Interesting. The final statement that Intel should not be allowed to restrict its compiler to Intel processors is bunk, although that would be a stupid thing to do.It was, and still is, the Math Kernel Library that has the speed bump.
I don't know whether the MKL had it, but the runtime library of the
compiler itself happily performed this naughty check, as explained for
example in http://www.swallowtail.org/naughty-intel.shtml (the vectorized
math library was part of the compiler runtime, not MKL).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: Steven Correll
- Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: Mark Mackey
- Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- References:
- Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: Beliavsky
- Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: sturlamolden
- Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: JB
- Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: sturlamolden
- Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- From: FX
- Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- Next by Date: Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- Previous by thread: Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- Next by thread: Re: Intel Compiler Reimbursement Fund
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|