Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Terence <tbwright@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 21, 12:29 am, Arjan <arjan.van.d...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think the most direct (or bluntest) reply to this is: if you cannot
install a newsreader and configure its filtering mechanisms, you are not
ready to write software.
I don't care if CLF-members are qualified to write software,
as long as they can help me out.
Even after having filtered out spam, you will see that the
number of discussions on CLF about Fortran declines severely.
The explosion of spam via Google has decimated the number of
discussions on CLF that I find useful.
This refutes the above proposition.
Spam does be an issue.
Ignoring its impact is ignoring the demise of CLF.
Which is a pity.
A.
Hurrah for logic!
I wish more would understand this point!
Checking the statistics of Google, counts the spam, unfortunately.
You have to keep the fitered postings as I do and COUNT THEM per month
or year.
The spam itself is causing more advertisers to post more spam becaues
of the perceived posting rates!!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: robin
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: gmail-unlp
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: dpb
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- References:
- Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: sturlamolden
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Tim Prince
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Daniel H
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Arjan
- Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Next by Date: Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Next by thread: Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|