Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Sebastian Rooks <i_dont_have@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 03:40:44 +0200
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:50:19 -0700, nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard
Maine) wrote:
Terence <tbwright@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 21, 9:32 am, nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Maine) wrote:
On 4/20/2011 6:12 PM, Terence wrote:
On Apr 19, 11:39 pm, dpb<n...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Because of the c-l-f membership figures (used to be one of the
highest).
.."membership" isn't even a meaningful concept for
newsgroups.
Google counts the items posted per month; NOT the readership.
I thought that was clear.
Apparently not to all of us. I don't actually go around trying to
research what unspecified statistics you might be referring to. I just
read the words as posted. When you use the word "membership" (your exact
word), that sure doesn't translate to "items posted" to me.
In his defense, I think that has to do with the meaningful terms that
completely lost its meaning with the introduction of google's
services.
What was once usenet/news "became" in a way google "groups".
news became rss feeds, and usenet became some sort of illegal software
downloading service(?) ...
Since one, if I understood correctly, needs to be a "member" (or
something of a kind) of a group (google group), therefore the term
"membership".
Sebastian
.
- References:
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Gordon Sande
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: dpb
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Terence
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: dpb
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Terence
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- From: Richard Maine
- Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Prev by Date: Re: integer random number generator in given range
- Next by Date: Re: Google -originated spam is now 99.7%
- Previous by thread: Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Next by thread: Re: Another Fortran forum (without the spam)?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|