Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- From: Louisa <louisa.hutch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 30, 8:18 am, Gib Bogle <g.bo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30/10/2011 1:59 a.m., Daniel Carrera wrote:
In some compilers, "double" will be 8, and in other compilers it will be
something else,
In my working life I've never met a compiler for which it is something
else, and I'm pretty confident that in what remains of it I will never
meet one.
Certainly Silverfrost compilers use numbers other than 4 and 8.
Those numbers are meaningless.
And even if you never "meet" such a compiler,
those that follow you may "meet" one,
in which case you code won't work (assuming that
you have persisted in writing non-portable code).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- From: Gib Bogle
- Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- References:
- is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- From: Jinsong Zhao
- Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- From: Daniel Carrera
- Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- From: Gib Bogle
- is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- Prev by Date: Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- Next by Date: Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- Previous by thread: Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- Next by thread: Re: is real*8 a standard declaration style?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|