Re: how do PSoCs compare to AVRs and PICs?
From: Rene Tschaggelar (none_at_none.none)
Date: 12/23/03
- Next message: Ralph Malph: "Low cost PCB layout software"
- Previous message: Mike Silva: "Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems"
- Next in thread: Mood: "Re: how do PSoCs compare to AVRs and PICs?"
- Maybe reply: Mood: "Re: how do PSoCs compare to AVRs and PICs?"
- Maybe reply: Johnny: "Re: how do PSoCs compare to AVRs and PICs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 19:26:29 GMT
Michael wrote:
> Hi - PICs and AVRs enjoy a large amount of popularity among both
> professionals and hobbyists - but PSoCs don't seem to be very popular among
> either group. Is there any particular reason that AVRs and PICs are so much
> more popular than PSoCs? How do they compare feature, price, and speed
> wise? Thanks,
The are like pears and apples.
PSoCs are a cpu kernel with some generic analog circuit.
Wheras the PIC and AVR are a cpu, some digital peripherals and
usually an ADC.
Rene
-- Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com & commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net
- Next message: Ralph Malph: "Low cost PCB layout software"
- Previous message: Mike Silva: "Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems"
- Next in thread: Mood: "Re: how do PSoCs compare to AVRs and PICs?"
- Maybe reply: Mood: "Re: how do PSoCs compare to AVRs and PICs?"
- Maybe reply: Johnny: "Re: how do PSoCs compare to AVRs and PICs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]