Re: does anybody use a seperate marketing company?
From: Simon Hosie (gumboot_at_learcay.etnay.nzsomething.invalid)
Date: 12/24/03
- Next message: Gene S. Berkowitz: "Re: Computational power AVR vs. MSP430?"
- Previous message: John R. Strohm: "Re: Computational power AVR vs. MSP430?"
- Next in thread: Ian Bell: "Re: does anybody use a seperate marketing company?"
- Reply: Ian Bell: "Re: does anybody use a seperate marketing company?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:24:00 +1300
Simon Hosie:
> Well it can't have done them any good. When did you last see a new
> idea in the toy industry?
Lewin A.R.W. Edwards wrote:
> Tamagotchi and Furby come to mind.
What's that, then? About a five-year period?
Now that trading cards have gone digital, well that opens up a whole new
line of non-innovation.
> The problem is that the marketing structure through which these new
> ideas must pass first bites out most of the innovation, then forces
> the product to be costed-down until it's just another blinkenlight
> with a 3-second speech chip.
> [...]
So... what you're saying is that money is paid to develop a new product,
and then more money is paid to reduce that product to being essentially
the same as all the existing products?
That's certainly a familiar story.
- Next message: Gene S. Berkowitz: "Re: Computational power AVR vs. MSP430?"
- Previous message: John R. Strohm: "Re: Computational power AVR vs. MSP430?"
- Next in thread: Ian Bell: "Re: does anybody use a seperate marketing company?"
- Reply: Ian Bell: "Re: does anybody use a seperate marketing company?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|