Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems
From: Bob Stephens (stephensdigital_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: Lewin A.R.W. Edwards: "Re: __Advertise your AD message directly your customers!"
- Previous message: TheDoc: "Re: Extra addr. lines needed"
- In reply to: Chris Hills: "Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems"
- Next in thread: Martin Krischik: "Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:12:37 GMT
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:36:13 +0000, Chris Hills wrote:
> In article <bssflk$10el5$1@ID-77047.news.uni-berlin.de>, Dmitry A.
> Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes
>>Chris Hills wrote:
>>
>>> In article <1731094.1f7Irsyk1h@linux1.krischik.com>, Martin Krischik
>>> <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes
>>>>
>>>>I had my array start at 1 not 0. In C all numbers start with 0 but in the
>>>>real world they usualy start with 1.
>>>
>>> Interesting point. Apparently 0 is the first positive integer.
>>
>>Zero is the first natural number, positive numbers do not include zero.
> Is that in maths, computing or philosophy?
>
>>> Everything starts at 0. Otherwise things would start with 1 or -1 there
>>> would be nothing (not 0) between them :-)
>>> Zero is a valid number.
>>All numbers are valid. What could be an "invalid" number?
>
> My phone bill :-)
>
>
GNP
Consumer Satisfaction Index
any election year stat
women's ages
etc etc ...
- Next message: Lewin A.R.W. Edwards: "Re: __Advertise your AD message directly your customers!"
- Previous message: TheDoc: "Re: Extra addr. lines needed"
- In reply to: Chris Hills: "Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems"
- Next in thread: Martin Krischik: "Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|