Re: Low cost PCB layout software
From: Leon Heller (aqzf13_at_dsl.pipex.com)
Date: 01/03/04
- Next message: Gary Kato: "Re: AVR Atmega169 help"
- Previous message: RussT: "Re: PIC + DDS = Frequency Synthesizer?"
- In reply to: Ralph Malph: "Re: Low cost PCB layout software"
- Next in thread: Ville Voipio: "Re: Low cost PCB layout software"
- Reply: Ville Voipio: "Re: Low cost PCB layout software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 04:21:17 +0000
Ralph Malph wrote:
> I just wanted to let people know where I ended up. As I posted before,
> many of these packages are limited enough that I was not going to spend
> time to evaluate them without being able to do useful work. So the only
> package I actually tried is Eagle from Cadsoft. I am finding that it is
> very hard to learn, at least compared to what I expected. I can
> normally pick up tools very easily, but I find Eagle to be very, very
> counter intuitive and the "tutorial" is very limited.
>
> On the other hand, I have been getting some work done with this tool. I
> am finding that even though this is a very tiny board (.5" x .6")
> perhaps this was not such a simple task. The board is double sided with
> a very high component density. I also need to provide as much ground
> plane as possible to help spread the heat to use what little board area
> there is. So I am having to learn how to cover areas of the board with
> copper fill. In fact that is where I am currently stuck.
>
> The support newsgroups for this tool seem pretty good. One actually has
> Cadsoft people posting. So by reading what others have had trouble with
> and using a lot of patience, I expect I will get this design done after
> a while.
>
> Thanks to all who posted. If anyone knows of a tool that is more
> intuative, please let me know. Since board layout will be an occasional
> task for me, I expect I will have to relearn some of the tricker aspects
> of Eagle every time I use it. :)
EasyPC is *very* much easier to use than Eagle (it's a proper Windows
application), has fewer bugs and is cheaper. Pulsonix (out of the same
stable) is better for professional work.
Leon
-- Leon Heller, G1HSM Email: aqzf13@dsl.pipex.com My low-cost Philips LPC210x ARM development system: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html
- Next message: Gary Kato: "Re: AVR Atmega169 help"
- Previous message: RussT: "Re: PIC + DDS = Frequency Synthesizer?"
- In reply to: Ralph Malph: "Re: Low cost PCB layout software"
- Next in thread: Ville Voipio: "Re: Low cost PCB layout software"
- Reply: Ville Voipio: "Re: Low cost PCB layout software"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|