Re: Keil Tiny RX?
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:45:33 +0100
So can anyone say when RTOS would be necessery
it seems to me that for 8051 complexity of projects
it is almost never needed?
What kind of applications would "need" RTOS?
Relevant Pages
- Re: PLC PAC operating system
... If I had to design a safety critical system, ... complexity as much as possible, this means getting rid of any RTOS. ... I am biased but I think using an already certified RTOS helps a great ... But, of course, if the design paradigm says no external software, I'd ...
(comp.arch.embedded) - Re: Detailed article about Mars Rover falure in EE Times
... Using a commercial RTOS does not really add complexity. ... personnally thing you go better by a mature RTOS ... than writing your own task-switching routine. ...
(comp.arch.embedded) - Re: I dont use an RTOS because...
... >>If all we are talking about here is the RTOS, ... > writing batch and interactive time share applications. ... most large libraries such as libc. ... that we live our lives in chains ...
(comp.arch.embedded) - Re: RT/embedded OS use poll
... platforms for their router plug-in cards and didn't even consider ... DSPs on availability of embedded Linux and never considered an RTOS ... For many other applications, the other side of the spectrum works fine too. ...
(comp.arch.embedded) - Re: So... What are the alternatives? Was: I dont use an RTOS because...
... whether that be an RTOS or not. ... of the applications which use its services. ... Without meaning (semantics) there is no understanding. ... Kennesaw, GA, USA 30144 http://mnmoran.org "So often times it happens, that we live our lives in chains and we never even know we have the key." ...
(comp.arch.embedded) |
|
