Re: Embedded programming usually solo?
From: Trevor Barton (tmb_at_Xisotek.co.uk)
Date: 01/12/04
- Previous message: MArk: "Re: Keil Tiny RX?"
- In reply to: Frank Bemelman: "Re: Embedded programming usually solo?"
- Next in thread: Michael Furman: "Re: Embedded programming usually solo?"
- Reply: Michael Furman: "Re: Embedded programming usually solo?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:30:28 GMT
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:44:28 +0100, Frank Bemelman wrote:
> "Trevor Barton" <tmb@Xisotek.co.uk> schreef in bericht
> news:slrnbvof9p.79o.tmb@sheep.isotek.co.uk...
>>
>> In principle, of course, code is self documenting. After all, the
>> computer has no problem in reading it, understanding it, and doing
>> exactly what the code tells it to do! It's just our undertanding
>> of the programming language is not as good as the computer's, so we
>> need all the extra verbiage around the code to try to explain what
>> the code means. If we spoke native C or whatever there'd be no issue!
>
> And there would be no obfuscated C contests...
Oh, I don't know. When I first moved here to Yorkshire from Australia
20 odd years ago I thought the locals spoke obfuscated English, especially
the kid who came and knocked on my front door asking something which to
this day I have no idea what!
-- Trevor Barton
- Previous message: MArk: "Re: Keil Tiny RX?"
- In reply to: Frank Bemelman: "Re: Embedded programming usually solo?"
- Next in thread: Michael Furman: "Re: Embedded programming usually solo?"
- Reply: Michael Furman: "Re: Embedded programming usually solo?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|