Re: Using Visual C/C++ to do 8051 development
From: Albert Lee Mitchell (albmit_at_albert.amresearch.com)
Date: 02/08/04
- Next message: Albert Lee Mitchell: "Re: What are the typical applications for Atmel's CPUs?"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: NicheTask Open Source Operating System"
- In reply to: Scott Moore: "Re: Using Visual C/C++ to do 8051 development"
- Next in thread: Chris Hills: "Re: Using Visual C/C++ to do 8051 development"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 05:03:16 -0800
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 07:30:08 +0000, Scott Moore wrote:
---------snip----------
>> Many good points but one overriding negative, the map is not the terrain.
>> No emulator and no simulator can ever precisely reproduce the hardware
>> response characteristics. This is why I, and many others, develop on the
>> exact hardware being produced.
>
> I used to believe that. Then I went to work on IC design. It turns out
> that simulators are MORE accurate than hardware. Why ? Heisenberg, as
> in "the uncertainty principle".
No doubt simulators work fine in the lab but in the field or in real
world equipment I'd have to respectfully disagree.
> Another proof is simple. Many companies simulate against the actual
> verilog or VHDL used to create the chip(s) in use.
Is a map of a map proof?
-- Regards, Albert
----------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Research, Inc. The Embedded Systems Experts
http://www.amresearch.com 916.780.7623
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Albert Lee Mitchell: "Re: What are the typical applications for Atmel's CPUs?"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: NicheTask Open Source Operating System"
- In reply to: Scott Moore: "Re: Using Visual C/C++ to do 8051 development"
- Next in thread: Chris Hills: "Re: Using Visual C/C++ to do 8051 development"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|