Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed
From: Frank Bemelman (fbemelx_at_euronet.invalid.nl)
Date: 02/10/04
- Next message: Bill Knight: "Re: flash chip for atmel 40008"
- Previous message: Frank Bemelman: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- In reply to: David Brown: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- Next in thread: David Brown: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- Reply: David Brown: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:27:14 +0100
"David Brown" <david@no.westcontrol.spam.com> schreef in bericht
news:c0afcv$dm5$1@news.netpower.no...
> This summary covers many such threads, but not this one:
Another one came to mind. If assembly takes more time, and
time is not an infinite resource, the final application is
bound to have either less performance or less functionality
and presumably lack both.
Yet another reason to sweep assembly where it belongs. And
that's a rather small arena, getting smaller by the day.
-- Thanks, Frank. (remove 'x' and 'invalid' when replying by email)
- Next message: Bill Knight: "Re: flash chip for atmel 40008"
- Previous message: Frank Bemelman: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- In reply to: David Brown: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- Next in thread: David Brown: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- Reply: David Brown: "Re: AVR Beginner Questions - Ports and Speed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|