Re: Embeddable editor C source?
From: George Neuner (gneuner2_at_dont.spam.me)
Date: 02/20/04
- Next message: Alaric B Snell: "Re: arm7 atmel vs others"
- Previous message: Trevor Barton: "Re: Spirit rover OS problems ( a reliable language )"
- In reply to: Hans-Bernhard Broeker: "Re: Embeddable editor C source?"
- Next in thread: buddy.spaminator.smith_at_ieee.org.invalid: "Re: Embeddable editor C source?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 05:05:11 -0500
On 19 Feb 2004 18:19:07 GMT, Hans-Bernhard Broeker
<broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Dingo wrote:
>
>> > Woudn't using GNU GPL source code in the project require
>> > distribution all the code for the device?
>
>> If it is a separate program, why? If it is embedded in something
>> else, yes, but that was not the OPs question.
>
>Well, this _is_ c.a.embedded, and the subject is an embeddable editor
>(for an 8-bit platform, too, which probably makes use of GNU ed a
>non-option, anyway).
>
>While I'm certainly not a lawyer, I don't think one can have separate
>programs inside an actual embedded system so as to wiggle out of the
>so-called "GPL virus" clause that way.
I think an argument could probably be made for a separate executable
running under a heavyweight RTOS (VxWorks, QNX, etc.). In any case
I'm sure the FSF would find some way to disagree.
George (also not a lawyer)
==============================================
Send real email to GNEUNER2 at COMCAST dot NET
- Next message: Alaric B Snell: "Re: arm7 atmel vs others"
- Previous message: Trevor Barton: "Re: Spirit rover OS problems ( a reliable language )"
- In reply to: Hans-Bernhard Broeker: "Re: Embeddable editor C source?"
- Next in thread: buddy.spaminator.smith_at_ieee.org.invalid: "Re: Embeddable editor C source?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|