Re: MCU/DSP dsPIC Alternatives?
From: Lou (lou.leen_at_Oh.no.nl)
Date: 03/27/04
- Next message: Meindert Sprang: "Re: Sensor Network"
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: Serial port logger w/real time playback"
- In reply to: Earl Bollinger: "Re: MCU/DSP dsPIC Alternatives?"
- Next in thread: Jack Klein: "Re: MCU/DSP dsPIC Alternatives?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:25:31 GMT
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:59:22 -0600, "Earl Bollinger"
<earlwbollinger@comcast.net> wrote:
>The Motorola DSP56F80x series works good.
>But maybe it is a little slow at 80mhz for you. Plus it's only a 16 bit DSP
>chip.
>I like the ones from www.newmicros.com as they come with ISOMAX(tm) and
>FORTH built in for ease of use.
>It's fun to not have to use a JTAG programmer unless you need it.
>But there is also Metrowerks Code warrior, an assembler and a free Small C
>compiler too. I think someone else has a C compiler too for it.
>I like the chip for all the timers that it has and all the PWM channels you
>can get going for motion control etc.
>
>"Chris Carlen" <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:c3tmh902tn1@enews2.newsguy.com...
>> Hi:
>>
>> I'm looking for DSP-like microcontrollers and microcontroller-like DSPs.
>>
>> So far I am interested in TMS320F2812, but it is a bit heavy handed for
>> some applications I would be considering.
>>
>> I had decided to move away from Microchip a few years ago and instead
>> standardize on AVR for my 8-bit MCU of choice, mainly because of avr-gcc
>> and the AVR architecture is much more pleasant to work with. My
>> applications are ease of use and tool cost conscious more than anything,
>> so I don't mind the slightly higher price of AVRs.
>>
>> But I will be needing some DSP capabilities. I would like to find a CPU
>> that gives reasonable performance of 30-150MIPS with lots of MCU
>> peripherals. The dsPIC and the TI are the ones I am aware of so far.
>>
>> I spent some time lately looking at the dsPIC again, and despite my
>> wanting to avoid Microchip and their klunky architectures, I have to
>> admit this chip seems dsPICable, er, I mean pretty nice. But the darned
>> thing appears to be vaporware!
>>
>> Anyway, I will be attending a 1-day workshop with TI on the TMS320F2812,
>> and getting a development kit.
>>
>> As for Microchip, I guess we'll just have to wait.
>>
>> Any other recommendations for MCU-like DSPs and DSP-like MCUs? I don't
>> really like the idea of going to Motorola, since I have heard their
>> tools are a headache (needing to but a different tool for each chip) and
>> I never know if their chips are going to be discontinued tomorrow.
>> Other than those objections, I do know they have some nice
>DSP/controllers.
>>
>> Another idea I suppose for the 30-150 MIPS range might be ARM, since I
>> know it has some MACs and stuff like that. Haven't really researched
>> ARM much yet.
>>
>> I sure hope the market drives the production of more of these hybrid
>> DSP/MCU type chips in the future.
>>
>> Thanks for comments.
>>
>>
>> Good day!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _____________________
>> Christopher R. Carlen
>> crobc@earthlink.net
>> Suse 8.1 Linux 2.4.19
>>
>
>
Hi, make sure you take a look at the Analog Devices BlackFin family.
16-bit fixed point, reasonably priced and with excellent tools.
AD actually calls these processors rather than DSP's.
The BF533 is the one to look at the hardest.
Cheers,
Lou
- Next message: Meindert Sprang: "Re: Sensor Network"
- Previous message: CBFalconer: "Re: Serial port logger w/real time playback"
- In reply to: Earl Bollinger: "Re: MCU/DSP dsPIC Alternatives?"
- Next in thread: Jack Klein: "Re: MCU/DSP dsPIC Alternatives?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|