Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?
From: Stef (stef33d_at_yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Dejan Durdenic: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Previous message: Dejan Durdenic: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- In reply to: Al Borowski: "Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Next in thread: Ben Bradley: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Reply: Ben Bradley: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:51:29 +0200
In comp.arch.embedded,
Al Borowski <aj.borowski@erasethis.student.qut.edu.au> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was reading the thread about C++ in embedded systems, and a few people
>mentions devices with tiny amounts of RAM. This made me wonder...
>
>What is the smallest, most limited system you've ever worked with? How
>hard is it to program a 4 bit micro?
>
That would be my current project as mentioned before. :-)
ATtiny11, 8-bit AVR
- 32 8-bit registers
(some instructions can only access the upper 16 regs)
- 3-level hardware stack
- 512 code words (16-bit)
- 8-pin, upto 6 I/O
-- Stef (remove caps, dashes and .invalid from e-mail address to reply) The older a man gets, the farther he had to walk to school as a boy.
- Next message: Dejan Durdenic: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Previous message: Dejan Durdenic: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- In reply to: Al Borowski: "Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Next in thread: Ben Bradley: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Reply: Ben Bradley: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|