Re: Towards better embedded software (long
From: Steve at fivetrees (steve_at_NOSPAMTAfivetrees.com)
Date: 05/03/04
- Next message: Kiran Vinta: "CS8900a problems (very long post)"
- Previous message: Rick Merrill: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- In reply to: CodeSprite: "Re: Towards better embedded software (long"
- Next in thread: Ken Lee: "Re: Towards better embedded software (long"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 00:24:23 +0100
"CodeSprite" <debate@codesprite.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94DDB8EEB8384oHcRiKeYwotID@63.218.45.215...
>
> Well I don't know... my attitude is "all software is guilty until proven
> innocent" - also known as debugging by bloody-mindedness. There again, if
> I've eliminated errors before releasing code, couldn't I say there were no
> bugs and therefore I hadn't been debugging? I wouldn't mind too much if
> someone said he was good at debugging, if it meant he actively looked for
> problems in his own or other people's code, rather than glazing over and
> saying "looks ok to me".
Point taken, but I talk in terms of "good design" and "verification" rather
than "debugging" ;).
> One problem is that we call them "bugs" - makes them sound cute and
> whimsical. They are MISTAKES caused by failing to think through the
> problem, and the longer they go undetected the more expensive they are to
> fix.
Exactly. I can't think of any design activity that I'm involved in where
failure is accepted so casually and routinely - other than software.
Steve
http://www.sfdesign.co.uk
http://www.fivetrees.com
- Next message: Kiran Vinta: "CS8900a problems (very long post)"
- Previous message: Rick Merrill: "Re: Smallest system you've ever worked on?"
- In reply to: CodeSprite: "Re: Towards better embedded software (long"
- Next in thread: Ken Lee: "Re: Towards better embedded software (long"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|