Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?
From: Eric Smith (eric-no-spam-for-me_at_brouhaha.com)
Date: 05/15/04
- Next message: Chris: "Re: Lewin A.R.W. Edwards"
- Previous message: Bruce: "Re: A quick c programming survey question"
- In reply to: Michael McCulloch: "Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Next in thread: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Reply: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 14 May 2004 18:07:38 -0700
Michael McCulloch <michaelm@nospam.invalid.net> writes:
> After several intsruments built with the 6805, I'm looking to upgrade
> to a more modern processor with more code space and RAM, as well as
> more modern debugging schemes. The 6808 series seems to fit the bill,
> specifically the GP32 chip.
I *very* much doubt that you want to use a 6808. You must mean 68HC08
series, which is quite different than the 6808.
- Next message: Chris: "Re: Lewin A.R.W. Edwards"
- Previous message: Bruce: "Re: A quick c programming survey question"
- In reply to: Michael McCulloch: "Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Next in thread: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Reply: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]