Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?
From: Michael McCulloch (michaelm_at_nospam.invalid.net)
Date: 05/15/04
- Next message: Mike V.: "Re: How to connect a CAN Bus transceiver?"
- Previous message: Mike V.: "Re: How to make a homemade dongle for a microcontroller-based sytem?"
- In reply to: Eric Smith: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Next in thread: Gary Schnabl: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Reply: Gary Schnabl: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 22:06:53 -0400
On 14 May 2004 18:07:38 -0700, Eric Smith
<eric-no-spam-for-me@brouhaha.com> wrote:
>I *very* much doubt that you want to use a 6808. You must mean 68HC08
>series, which is quite different than the 6808.
Yes, 68HC08/68HC12 is what I meant. I tend to drop the HC in everyday
conversation as it gets tiring to say over and over.
The specific chip I want to use is the MC68HC908GP32.
--- Michael McCulloch
- Next message: Mike V.: "Re: How to connect a CAN Bus transceiver?"
- Previous message: Mike V.: "Re: How to make a homemade dongle for a microcontroller-based sytem?"
- In reply to: Eric Smith: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Next in thread: Gary Schnabl: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Reply: Gary Schnabl: "Re: Comments on PE Micro's Cyclone Pro for 6808/6812?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]