Re: embedded Vs Realtime
From: Grant Edwards (grante_at_visi.com)
Date: 05/23/04
- Next message: Richard: "Re: "What time is it?" aksed the microcontroller"
- Previous message: TM: "Lantronix Xport SNMP"
- In reply to: Paul Keinanen: "Re: embedded Vs Realtime"
- Next in thread: Pete Fenelon: "Re: embedded Vs Realtime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 23 May 2004 16:20:31 GMT
In article <jno0b0tumu4in0lskrb449qveqstheqhoc@4ax.com>, Paul Keinanen wrote:
>>The most common definition of real-time is that a task must be
>>accomplished by a pre-defined deadline, or it's considered a
>>failure. Payroll meets that definition. If a company doesn't
>>make payroll, there can be very serious consequences.
>
> Is the paycheck invalid or useless if it is printed one day late ?
Possibly. It may mean that the company who didn't get the
check sent out is in breach of a contract and subject to
penalties, leins, etc.
> In that case it would be hard real time.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! My forehead feels
at like a PACKAGE of moist
visi.com CRANBERRIES in a remote
FRENCH OUTPOST!!
- Next message: Richard: "Re: "What time is it?" aksed the microcontroller"
- Previous message: TM: "Lantronix Xport SNMP"
- In reply to: Paul Keinanen: "Re: embedded Vs Realtime"
- Next in thread: Pete Fenelon: "Re: embedded Vs Realtime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|