Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century
From: Alan Balmer (albalmer_at_att.net)
Date: 05/26/04
- Next message: Guillaume: "Re: "Am I still working okay?" asked the micro controller..."
- Previous message: Grant Edwards: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- In reply to: Al Borowski: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- Next in thread: Al Borowski: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- Reply: Al Borowski: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:47:04 -0700
On Wed, 26 May 2004 17:56:26 +1000, Al Borowski
<aj.borowski@erasethis.student.qut.edu.au> wrote:
>
>For long longish posts like yours that only have 1 point, I completely
>agree.
Agree with what? Something on the next screen of the message, I
presume, but I'm not going to bother searching for it.
"long longish posts" that have only one point probably do not need to
be quoted in full.
-- Al Balmer Balmer Consulting removebalmerconsultingthis@att.net
- Next message: Guillaume: "Re: "Am I still working okay?" asked the micro controller..."
- Previous message: Grant Edwards: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- In reply to: Al Borowski: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- Next in thread: Al Borowski: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- Reply: Al Borowski: "Re: OT: Bottom Post for 20th century"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
