Re: LED & Resistor befuddlement
From: CBFalconer (cbfalconer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/03/04
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: Bit width?"
- Previous message: robin.pain_at_tesco.net: "Re: There is no such thing as a troll-post"
- In reply to: Peter Jakacki: "Re: LED & Resistor befuddlement"
- Next in thread: Peter Jakacki: "Re: LED & Resistor befuddlement"
- Reply: Peter Jakacki: "Re: LED & Resistor befuddlement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:44:14 GMT
Peter Jakacki wrote:
>
... snip ...
>
> I would skip the pulldown resistor altogether and simply drive the
> output low for a few cycles then switch it back to an input.
> The CMOS inputs have more than enough capacitance and a low enough
> leakage to hold the charge from the last driven state.
Bad idea. You just don't leave CMOS input lines open. They can
drift to a state where both input transistors are on, and just
drawing excess current without limit.
-- fix (vb.): 1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view; 2. to work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences that are worse than the original problem. Usage: "Windows ME fixes many of the shortcomings of Windows 98 SE". - Hutchison
- Next message: CBFalconer: "Re: Bit width?"
- Previous message: robin.pain_at_tesco.net: "Re: There is no such thing as a troll-post"
- In reply to: Peter Jakacki: "Re: LED & Resistor befuddlement"
- Next in thread: Peter Jakacki: "Re: LED & Resistor befuddlement"
- Reply: Peter Jakacki: "Re: LED & Resistor befuddlement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]