Re: rtos features
From: Norm Dresner (ndrez_at_att.net)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: Tony Williams: "Re: Simple data bus over DC Power Wires"
- Previous message: Not Really Me: "Re: rtos features"
- In reply to: Sagar: "rtos features"
- Next in thread: Sagar: "Re: rtos features"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:00:44 GMT
"Sagar" <mailsagr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b0a2c083.0406212038.1c80d905@posting.google.com...
> hello,
>
> i am evaluating various rtos for on of our products based on arm7. i
> have been looking at Nucleus, embOS, Rtxc, Threadx and MicroC os-ii.
> Of the lot Threadx and embOS seem to be good. Although i believe that
> the others are just as good. It seems hard to zero in one choice. I
> have been searching for reviews in the newsgroups. I have found some
> scattered info for nucleus and threadx (threadx apparently seems to be
> better).
>
> I am primarily looking at these features:
> Scheduling, events, queues, low interrupt latencies, small mem
> footprint, fast context switching, ....
>
> I would appreciate if somebody could post their views/experiences on
> these rtos'.
>
What about Real-Time Linux? There's a free version available that I've
used for years in pseudo PCs but they also have versions for a variety of
uPs.
Norm
- Next message: Tony Williams: "Re: Simple data bus over DC Power Wires"
- Previous message: Not Really Me: "Re: rtos features"
- In reply to: Sagar: "rtos features"
- Next in thread: Sagar: "Re: rtos features"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
