Re: Few questions on embedded stuff...
From: Ben Bradley (ben_nospam_bradley_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: Ben Bradley: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff"
- Previous message: Rick Merrill: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- In reply to: Joerg: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- Next in thread: Joerg: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- Reply: Joerg: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:39:40 -0400
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:21:18 GMT, Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:
>Hi Guy
>
>>...While Ps may be acceptable in some cases (e.g. if another plane hits you), the use of Ps to cover up inadequate aircraft design is not.
>>
>>
>So how about using them for sports activities? Or should I feel guilty
>now that I ever used one for non-emergencies?
Huh? You jumped out of a perfectly good, operating airplane??? Or
was it the airplane described at the end of Ganssle's WDT article?
>Regards, Joerg
>
>http://www.analogconsultants.com
- Next message: Ben Bradley: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff"
- Previous message: Rick Merrill: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- In reply to: Joerg: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- Next in thread: Joerg: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- Reply: Joerg: "Re: Few questions on embedded stuff..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|