PicBasic vs. C
From: Alex Parkinson (alex_at_circuitwerkes.com)
Date: 07/14/04
- Next message: Everett M. Greene: "Re: floating point question on MSP430"
- Previous message: Michael Dombrowski: "Re: Mem usage on AVR?"
- Next in thread: Neil Bradley: "Re: PicBasic vs. C"
- Reply: Neil Bradley: "Re: PicBasic vs. C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:13:14 -0400
Hey everybody,
I'm faced with the task of convincing my boss to purchase a C compiler for
the PIC18F's, and I wanted to gather some thoughts from more experienced
engineers (I'm a recent graduate). We currently use PicBasic Pro, which has
worked fine since most of our projects are fairly small (< 2000 lines).
However, we're starting to move towards larger projects, and I strongly feel
that C is much better suited for larger programs. What are your thoughts as
to the relative advantages/disadvantages of C vs. PicBasic?
There are a few catches to the situation, however. First, since we already
own the PicBasic Pro compiler, it will be extremely difficult talking him
into shelling out $500 - $1000 for a C compiler. Also, he does not know C,
so he will view the move as pushing him out of the engineering aspect of the
company. Does anyone have any thoughs, recommendations, or warnings on how
to approach my boss with this somewhat delicate situation?
Thanks,
Alex Parkinson
- Next message: Everett M. Greene: "Re: floating point question on MSP430"
- Previous message: Michael Dombrowski: "Re: Mem usage on AVR?"
- Next in thread: Neil Bradley: "Re: PicBasic vs. C"
- Reply: Neil Bradley: "Re: PicBasic vs. C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|