Re: Intel's embedded Pentium kaput
From: Ignacio G.T. (igtorque.remove_at_evomer.yahoo.es)
Date: 07/16/04
- Next message: Ignacio G.T.: "Re: Safe-State or No-Safe-State (was Re: Continous eeprom checksum microcontroller)"
- Previous message: Gerard Bok: "Re: Looking for generic measurement api / industry leader"
- In reply to: james.boyle: "Re: Intel's embedded Pentium kaput"
- Next in thread: Jim Granville: "Re: Intel's embedded Pentium kaput"
- Reply: Jim Granville: "Re: Intel's embedded Pentium kaput"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:05:43 GMT
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 03:05:15 GMT, "james.boyle" <james.boyle@insightbb.com>
wrote:
>Where did you hear that Intel is discontinuing these embedded Pentiums?
>
http://developer.intel.com/design/support/faq/embed_proces/pentium.htm
"The Embedded Intel Architecture division is announcing the discontinuance of
the Intel® embedded Pentium processor modules. Both the 133 MHz and 166 MHz
modules have been discontinued and will be unavailable for additional orders
after the Last Product Discontinuance Order Date. More information is available
in the embedded Pentium processor module homepage and within PCN 973, available
from the PCN Index."
Also:
http://developer.intel.com/design/pcn/Processors/D0104125.pdf
-- Ignacio G.T.
- Next message: Ignacio G.T.: "Re: Safe-State or No-Safe-State (was Re: Continous eeprom checksum microcontroller)"
- Previous message: Gerard Bok: "Re: Looking for generic measurement api / industry leader"
- In reply to: james.boyle: "Re: Intel's embedded Pentium kaput"
- Next in thread: Jim Granville: "Re: Intel's embedded Pentium kaput"
- Reply: Jim Granville: "Re: Intel's embedded Pentium kaput"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]