Re: design advice
From: Tauno Voipio (tauno.voipio_at_iki.fi.NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: Mark A. Odell: "Re: 8- to 16-bit Embedded System Upgrade"
- Previous message: Gary Kato: "Re: PIC If...then....else directive"
- In reply to: Gerrit: "Re: design advice"
- Next in thread: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: design advice"
- Reply: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: design advice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:28:15 GMT
Gerrit wrote:
> All,
>
> thanks for the advice I will go into the diferent controlers and loop what
> would be most applyable.
>
> If there are stille pro and contra's for microchip vs arm please share.
>
>
ARM is a 32 bit device, while the other suggested processors have
narrower word width. The TCP/IP arithmetic is also 32 bits, so
there is a native advantage with an ARM. Also, a 32 bit processor
can more easily handle memories over 65 kbytes, which pretty
soon prove necessary with the TCP/IP applications.
Been there - done that (TCP/IP on AT91's).
Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
- Next message: Mark A. Odell: "Re: 8- to 16-bit Embedded System Upgrade"
- Previous message: Gary Kato: "Re: PIC If...then....else directive"
- In reply to: Gerrit: "Re: design advice"
- Next in thread: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: design advice"
- Reply: Joris Dobbelsteen: "Re: design advice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|