Re: [OT] sigs (was: Are there any 8051 C++ compilers ?)
From: David Brown (david_at_no.westcontrol.spam.com)
Date: 08/10/04
- Previous message: Robert Wessel: "Re: USB question"
- In reply to: Meindert Sprang: "Re: [OT] sigs (was: Are there any 8051 C++ compilers ?)"
- Next in thread: Meindert Sprang: "Re: [OT] sigs (was: Are there any 8051 C++ compilers ?)"
- Reply: Meindert Sprang: "Re: [OT] sigs (was: Are there any 8051 C++ compilers ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:05:12 +0200
"Meindert Sprang" <mhsprang@NOcustomSPAMware.nl> wrote in message
news:10hgpbhqelcqubf@corp.supernews.com...
> "David Brown" <david@no.westcontrol.spam.com> wrote in message
> news:cf9mre$75v$1@news.netpower.no...
> > While it is easy to get a Start/Run box without wading through menus
> > (<windows-key> + R), you can't start most windows programs by just
typing
> > their names - you've got to know the full path name in all its
> absurdities,
> > because MS has failed to produce an os and file system that can support
> > symbolic links and can work with large numbers of files in a directory.
>
> Well, a simple c:\bat in your path and a batch file for every program you
> want to start will do the trick....
>
Mine's called "d:\utils", and has about 400 batch files and small utility
programs... and then there's d:\cygwin\bin... (I'm a command-line junky).
Bat files are a workaround - ineligant, but they work.
> > Why on earth would you want to "boot to DOS" to run a DOS program?
What's
> > wrong with using a command prompt window, that has worked for every DOS
> > program (except some games) from Win95 through to XP?
>
> I stil use a few old DOS programs that open files by using FCB's instead
of
> filehandles. FCB's disappeared from NT4 and higher. So you would *have to*
> run either DOS or something "as low as" win 95 or ME.
>
Have you had a lookat DOSBox http://dosbox.sourceforge.net/ ? It's mainly
aimed at running games, but it might work for your old programs, and will
apparently run fine under pretty much any windows fork (as well as *nix). I
haven't tried it myself, though.
> Meindert
>
>
- Previous message: Robert Wessel: "Re: USB question"
- In reply to: Meindert Sprang: "Re: [OT] sigs (was: Are there any 8051 C++ compilers ?)"
- Next in thread: Meindert Sprang: "Re: [OT] sigs (was: Are there any 8051 C++ compilers ?)"
- Reply: Meindert Sprang: "Re: [OT] sigs (was: Are there any 8051 C++ compilers ?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|