Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet
From: Stephen (spambox42_at_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: 08/24/04
- Next message: Hans-Bernhard Broeker: "Re: Why ISR contains no arguments and return type is void"
- Previous message: Hans-Bernhard Broeker: "Re: Big-Endian vs. Little-Endian"
- Next in thread: Pablo Bleyer Kocik: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Pablo Bleyer Kocik: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Pete Fenelon: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Jim Granville: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Chon Tang: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Maybe reply: Kelly Hall: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: David Brown: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Stephen: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:17:55 +0100
Hello
I'm looking for suggestions for an embedded microcontroller (processor,
module or SBC all under consideration). I don't necessarily expect to get
everything on one chip or module, we will be supplying our own motherboard
either way, but the more we can get from the cpu/module then the less we
need on the motherboard. The ideal list of requirements are roughly:
- A fast 8-bitter, equivalent in performance to a theoretical 100MHz 8051
with hardware multiply/divide unit, or a medium sized 16-bitter or a low
end 32-bitter.
- 5V technology, or 3V with 5V compliant inputs/outputs. Surface mount.
- 512KB code space. At least eprom, preferably ISP flash (serial onchip
bootloader). Code estimate based on our current 8051 code which is 60000+
lines in around 150KB using Keil C51.
- 1MB battery backed up SRAM, although might consider 512KB SRAM if we can
cost effectively also have an additional 512KB+ of flash, possibly compact
flash.
- Preferably a flat address space, but paging would be acceptable if we
can get a "nice" page layout such as 32KB fixed + 32KB paged, and
providing the development environment's requirements didn't steal lots of
common page memory from us.
- Ethernet. 10BaseT minimal, 100BaseT would be nice. Would consider a
software solution or a single-chip solution, but either way, don't have
time to write the TCP/IP stack.
- 50 to 60 general I/O pins.
- 4 external interrupts. Multi-priority interrupt system.
- 2 CPU driven PWM channels.
- 6 serial ports, one of which can run in synchronous mode. (Suspect we'll
end up with 2 plus a quad UART or 4 plus a dual).
- SPI channel, although I'm happy to bit-bang that. Likewise I2C.
- 8x 10-bit ADC (multiplexing acceptable), although I suspect we'll
probably need to add a chip for this.
- Enough CPU internal programmable timers that we have at least 2 free for
our own private use after any other CPU components (e.g. serial + pwm) are
driven from timers.
- Realtime Clock, preferably a real hardware clock with programmable
minute interrupts and alarm times, and not a software based interrupt
driven clock off a simple "realtime counter".
- Watchdog timer.
- Power supervisor for RTC/SRAM protection and early power fail detection.
- Low cost (of course!) at 100 off quantities (500/year max). Difficult to
quantify given that our target is an overall price including our custom
motherboard, the complexity of which depends on what the cpu/module/sbc
gives us, but as a guide, a module with the processor/flash/sram should be
under $50.
We are currently considering either a fast top of the range 8051, the
C166/167, or the Rabbit 3000 modules, but all of which have "issues".
A top of the range 8051 seems to be prone to poor longevity. Not currently
sure about the longevity of a C166 or the availability of non-royalty
TCP/IP or how widely used the C166 is.
The rabbit, although nicely priced with ethernet, currently looks like it
hasn't got the horsepower. Dynamic C seems to suggest (in several
documents) around 50000 lines of C takes 1MB, which compared to our 8051
running 60000 lines in around 150KB makes it around 6 to 8 times less
efficient. Even accounting for the move to softools compiler (which we
would definitely be doing), we are assuming some of the inefficiency comes
about due to the Z80 architecture. Not only does this force up the code
size, but we wonder how much gain the 44MHz really is when the code is
this inefficient.
Software-only based TCP/IP on a 8 bit is also a concern, not having done
this before.
So, if anyone has any alternative suggestions we can look into, I'd
greatly appreciate it. I accept we are probably trying to get more out of
a small 8 bit micro than most others would attempt, hence we're now
considering 16/32 bit too.
Stephen
- Next message: Hans-Bernhard Broeker: "Re: Why ISR contains no arguments and return type is void"
- Previous message: Hans-Bernhard Broeker: "Re: Big-Endian vs. Little-Endian"
- Next in thread: Pablo Bleyer Kocik: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Pablo Bleyer Kocik: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Pete Fenelon: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Jim Granville: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Chon Tang: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Maybe reply: Kelly Hall: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: CBFalconer: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: David Brown: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Reply: Stephen: "Re: Looking for suggestions for processor/module/sbc with ethernet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|