Atmel Atmega128L and Macgraigor Wiggler

From: Pat Barlow (bypassmail_at_postmaster.co.uk)
Date: 09/27/04 

Date: 27 Sep 2004 09:02:26 -0700

We are regularly programming an Atmeg128l board with the Atmel JTAGICE
+ AVRStudio with no problems, but in production it would be useful to
use a MacGraigor Wiggler to program the Atmel, as we already have one
in our test/programming jig.
MacGraigor don't support the Atmel AVR devices, but I reckon there
should be a software solution to this, does anyone know what it might
look like?
TIA.
Pat.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Atmel Atmega128L and Macgraigor Wiggler
    ... but in production it would be useful to ... >use a MacGraigor Wiggler to program the Atmel, ... >MacGraigor don't support the Atmel AVR devices, ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Atmel Atmega128L and Macgraigor Wiggler
    ... Anton Erasmus wrote: ... >>We are regularly programming an Atmeg128l board with the Atmel JTAGICE ... >>use a MacGraigor Wiggler to program the Atmel, ... I'd be interested too in some code using the Alter Byteblaster for the AVR. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: ARM LPC22xx development tools
    ... which is listed as "production" and shows stock at Digikey. ... but the Atmel parts are very good. ... and the AT91SAM9260 is the closest fit for ... Will we need to buy a JTAG debugger as well, ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: ARM LPC22xx development tools
    ... we've got the NXP LPC2468...sort of. ... I recommend that you stick with the Atmel or NXP parts. ... which is listed as "production" and shows stock at Digikey. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: uC lifetime
    ... Atmel are the opposite: they drop product lines just like it. ... The AVRs 0.5u was droppped but there are other examples like the ATmega8 ... When Atmel announced the new AVR "A" range, it was announced that the older parts would remain in production. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)