Re: 10Base-T vs. 100Base-T (discussion)
From: Grant Edwards (grante_at_visi.com)
Date: 11/12/04
- Next message: John Harlow: "Need absolute rotary position encoder"
- Previous message: Ghazan Haider: "Which MCU has these features?"
- In reply to: Don: "Re: 10Base-T vs. 100Base-T (discussion)"
- Next in thread: Don: "Re: 10Base-T vs. 100Base-T (discussion)"
- Reply: Don: "Re: 10Base-T vs. 100Base-T (discussion)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 12 Nov 2004 03:17:07 GMT
On 2004-11-12, Don <none@given> wrote:
> You're assuming there are only two devices on the wire -- the
> unit in question and "something else" talking to it.
That's pretty much a requirement for 10BaseT and 100BaseT.
They are both point-to-point connections.
> I.e. if you have several devices sharing the wire -- in one or
> more applications -- then the load any one device sees may be
> considerably less (yet still bang the network pretty hard
> overall).
That's only going to be a consideration if you're using a dumb
hub rather than a switch, and dumb hubs are really hard to find
these days.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Yow! It's a hole
at all the way to downtown
visi.com Burbank!
- Next message: John Harlow: "Need absolute rotary position encoder"
- Previous message: Ghazan Haider: "Which MCU has these features?"
- In reply to: Don: "Re: 10Base-T vs. 100Base-T (discussion)"
- Next in thread: Don: "Re: 10Base-T vs. 100Base-T (discussion)"
- Reply: Don: "Re: 10Base-T vs. 100Base-T (discussion)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]