Re: what's a callback?
From: John Larkin (john_at_spamless.usa)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Anthony Fremont: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Previous message: Jürgen Veith: "Re: Soft VoIP"
- In reply to: Frank Bemelman: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Next in thread: Frank Bemelman: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Reply: Frank Bemelman: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Reply: Richard Henry: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:58:41 -0800
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:53:28 +0100, "Frank Bemelman"
<f.bemelmanq@xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote:
>My point is that the argument that Windows is 'bloated' doesn't hold.
>I bet that there are more PIC's running (relative) bloated code than
>PC's. Programmers at Microsoft aren't that stupid.
They're not stupid, but, working as a team, they do manage to produce
prodigious amounts of very bad code. After a decade of effort, they
still seem incapable of preventing buffer overflow exploits, and every
generation of Windows runs slower and is more difficult to maintain.
I've seen a bit of the Windows source code, and it's a mess. Windows
is simply bad programming.
John
- Next message: Anthony Fremont: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Previous message: Jürgen Veith: "Re: Soft VoIP"
- In reply to: Frank Bemelman: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Next in thread: Frank Bemelman: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Reply: Frank Bemelman: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Reply: Richard Henry: "Re: what's a callback?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
