Re: parallel eeproms and 8051
From: Tim Wescott (tim_at_wescottnospamdesign.com)
Date: 12/29/04
- Next message: RobJ: "Re: High speed USB 2.0 OTG component availability"
- Previous message: funkymunky: "Re: parallel eeproms and 8051"
- In reply to: funkymunky: "Re: parallel eeproms and 8051"
- Next in thread: funkymunky: "Re: parallel eeproms and 8051"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:45:40 -0800
funkymunky wrote:
> okay okay...i got that..another question:
>
> out of i2c and spi, which standard is more popular? any specific
> reasons for it?
>
No, because they address different concerns. Depending on the project
one may have occasion to use SPI, I2C or both.
If you want to hook up a small, fixed number of peripherals to a
microprocessor then SPI is much simpler to use. If you want to hook up
a large number, or an unknown number, of peripherals to a microprocessor
then I2C can't be beat.
Of course sometimes you have a peripheral that you must use that only
comes with one interface, and then you're stuck.
-- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
- Next message: RobJ: "Re: High speed USB 2.0 OTG component availability"
- Previous message: funkymunky: "Re: parallel eeproms and 8051"
- In reply to: funkymunky: "Re: parallel eeproms and 8051"
- Next in thread: funkymunky: "Re: parallel eeproms and 8051"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|