Re: AVR compilers
From: CBFalconer (cbfalconer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/11/05
- Previous message: Bob Stephens: "Re: Alternative for Silabs (cygnal)"
- In reply to: Ville Voipio: "Re: AVR compilers"
- Next in thread: Grant Edwards: "Re: AVR compilers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:31:39 GMT
Ville Voipio wrote:
>
... snip ...
>
> It would be nice to see comparisons between different compilers
> with real-life applications. The unfortunate thing is that
> the source code optimized for compiler A may be pessimized
> for compiler B, so making such comparisons is difficult.
However source code should be optimized for readability and
maintainability, and optimization left to the code generator. The
results should be quite viable for compiler comparisons.
This does not preclude algorithmic improvement.
-- Chuck F (cbfalconer@yahoo.com) (cbfalconer@worldnet.att.net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
- Previous message: Bob Stephens: "Re: Alternative for Silabs (cygnal)"
- In reply to: Ville Voipio: "Re: AVR compilers"
- Next in thread: Grant Edwards: "Re: AVR compilers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|