Re: Relocating application architecture and compiler support
From: glen herrmannsfeldt (gah_at_ugcs.caltech.edu)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: alan tsai: "What's behind JTAG/ICE break in action"
- Previous message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Relocating application architecture and compiler support"
- Maybe in reply to: s.subbarayan: "Relocating application architecture and compiler support"
- Next in thread: Edward Wolfgram: "Re: Relocating application architecture and compiler support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:10:34 -0800
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
(snip, I wrote)
>>I suppose there should be two kinds of position independent
>>code. One kind could be executed at any address, even more than
>>one (virtual) address at the same time. The second could
>>actually be moved to a different address while executing. It is
>>the second kind that is more complicated because registers could
>>hold addresses.
> It can't be moved while executing because the monitor is the
> one whose code is getting executed to do that shuffling task.
Well, that was supposed to include during interrupts.
-- glen
- Next message: alan tsai: "What's behind JTAG/ICE break in action"
- Previous message: glen herrmannsfeldt: "Re: Relocating application architecture and compiler support"
- Maybe in reply to: s.subbarayan: "Relocating application architecture and compiler support"
- Next in thread: Edward Wolfgram: "Re: Relocating application architecture and compiler support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|