Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?
From: Steve at fivetrees (steve_at_NOSPAMTAfivetrees.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Rich Webb: "Re: bake the IC before mounting?"
- Previous message: Steve at fivetrees: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- In reply to: Antti Keskinen: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Next in thread: Antti Keskinen: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Reply: Antti Keskinen: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 04:47:43 -0000
"Antti Keskinen" <antti.keskinen@REMOVEME.koti.luukku.com> wrote in message
news:cteabq$1l40$1@news.cc.tut.fi...
> C is more popular and more 'streamlined' (doesn't contain anything fancy)
> for smaller embedded systems. It can't be used for true object-oriented
> programming, but who needs OO on 8-bit processors ?
I disagree. I consider OO at least as much a design technique as a language
feature.
I agreed with the rest of your post, though ;).
Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com
- Next message: Rich Webb: "Re: bake the IC before mounting?"
- Previous message: Steve at fivetrees: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- In reply to: Antti Keskinen: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Next in thread: Antti Keskinen: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Reply: Antti Keskinen: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|