Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?
From: Dave Hansen (iddw_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Martin Schoeberl: "Re: SimmStick FPGA module"
- Previous message: Martin Schoeberl: "Re: SimmStick FPGA module"
- In reply to: Anton Erasmus: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Next in thread: Hershel Roberson: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:04:53 GMT
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:31:39 +0200, Anton Erasmus
<nobody@spam.prevent.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:27:03 GMT, iddw@hotmail.com (Dave Hansen)
>wrote:
>
[...]
>>FWIW, at the turn of the century I (briefly) worked on an application
>>using a (mumblemumble 500?) MHz Pentium running QNX and hosting 256 MB
>>RAM. The application itself wasn't that big (< 2 MB, IIRC), but it
>>sucked in huge volumes of (mostly image, but other kinds of mapping)
>>data for processing in real time. I won't claim it used all its
>>memory, but I know it used more than 128 MB.
>
>Yes, but most of the stuff was data. To have that much code is
>absolutely huge. What sort of application needs these massive amounts
>of code space. I am sure that many databases can basically grow to any
>size datawize.
Yes, that was my point. Memory holds more than programs.
In terms of conventional "embedded programming," we paid essentially
_no_ attention to the size of the application.
Regards,
-=Dave
-- Change is inevitable, progress is not.
- Next message: Martin Schoeberl: "Re: SimmStick FPGA module"
- Previous message: Martin Schoeberl: "Re: SimmStick FPGA module"
- In reply to: Anton Erasmus: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Next in thread: Hershel Roberson: "Re: C vs C++ in Embedded Systems?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|